Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-gufo-png.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-gufo-png-0.2.1-1.fc41.src.rpm Description: Data structure for PNG images. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe
This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129911196
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8737288 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2350482-rust-gufo-png/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08737288-rust-gufo-png/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
LGTM. First time I see a license file say literally ``` MPL-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later ``` Guess it's technically correct though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ === Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. ✅ package contains only permissible content ✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide 🫤 test suite is run and all unit tests pass. (Tests are disabled because of missing test data) ✅ latest version of the crate is packaged ✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora ✅ license file is included with %license in %files ✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks: - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter (*NOT* pre-release filter): alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer (should happen automatically) - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional) - track package in koschei for all built branches (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)
Thank you for the review! > First time I see a license file say literally > ``` > MPL-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later > ``` > Guess it's technically correct though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Yes, this confused me too, at first, but the actual license texts are also included as separate files, so ... :shrug:
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-gufo-png
FEDORA-2025-400fbca948 (rust-g2gen-1.2.0-1.fc43, rust-g2poly-1.2.0-1.fc43, and 4 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-400fbca948
FEDORA-2025-400fbca948 (rust-g2gen-1.2.0-1.fc43, rust-g2poly-1.2.0-1.fc43, and 4 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.