Bug 2350914 - Review Request: apfsprogs - Experimental APFS tools for Linux [NEEDINFO]
Summary: Review Request: apfsprogs - Experimental APFS tools for Linux
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/linux-apfs/apfsprogs
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-03-08 22:43 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2025-11-21 09:17 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review?
ngompa13: needinfo? (davide)


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Davide Cavalca 2025-03-08 22:43:26 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/apfsprogs/apfsprogs.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/apfsprogs/apfsprogs-0.2.0-1.fc43.src.rpm

Description:
Apfsprogs is a suite of userland software to work with the Apple File System on
Linux.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2025-03-08 22:43:29 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=130009330

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2025-03-09 14:40:31 UTC
Taking this package.

Davide, your files are returning HTTP 403 errors.

Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2025-03-10 03:36:26 UTC
Should be fixed now, the directory on fedorapeople was missing the execute bit for some reason

Comment 4 Neal Gompa 2025-03-10 18:20:31 UTC
Review notes:

* Package follows Fedora packaging guidelines
* Package builds and installs correctly
* Package licensing is mostly correct and provided license files are installed
  + I see code from zlib, wpa_supplicant, and some other vendored projects in here with licenses other than GPL-2.0-only. These need to be enumerated in the license tag and bundled provides where relevant.
* No serious issues from rpmlint

Please address the licensing related issues and then we should be good to go.

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 15:32:45 UTC
Hello,
I do realize that this is possibly an old ticket. I am sorry that it hasn't been
reviewed yet. Let me trigger the Fedora Review Service to see if the package
builds successfully. Hopefully, a green check mark will attract some reviewer.

If I am resurrecting an old ticket that you are not interested in anymore, my
apologies, feel free to close it.

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 15:38:45 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9819840
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2350914-apfsprogs/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09819840-apfsprogs/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 7 Neal Gompa 2025-11-21 09:17:08 UTC
Can you address my feedback in comment 4?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.