Bug 235436 - two files in devel packge that should be in main package
Summary: two files in devel packge that should be in main package
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: lftp   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Maros Barabas
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 235503 235559 235911 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: FC7Blocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-04-05 19:01 UTC by Thorsten Leemhuis
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-14 05:45:59 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Thorsten Leemhuis 2007-04-05 19:01:05 UTC
Description of problem:
Installing lftp tracks in devel package; that should not be needed, lftp should
work on its own without the devel subpackge. Only the *.so files should be in
the devel package, not the *.so.* files

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lftp-3.5.10-2.fc7

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
$ LC_ALL=C sudo rpm -ivh lftp-3.5.10-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm 
error: Failed dependencies:
        liblftp-jobs.so.0()(64bit) is needed by lftp-3.5.10-2.fc7.x86_64
        liblftp-tasks.so.0()(64bit) is needed by lftp-3.5.10-2.fc7.x86_64
$ LC_ALL=C sudo rpm -ivh lftp-3.5.10-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm
lftp-devel-3.5.10-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm 
Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
   1:lftp-devel             ########################################### [ 50%]
   2:lftp                   ########################################### [100%]
error reading information on service lftp: No such file or directory
$

Additional info:
the "error reading information on service lftp: No such file or directory"
should be fixed as well.

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2007-04-09 21:46:02 UTC
*** Bug 235503 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2007-04-09 21:46:18 UTC
*** Bug 235559 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Maros Barabas 2007-04-11 06:57:59 UTC
*** Bug 235911 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.