Bug 2356538 - [7.x Backport] - Error message is not descriptive for ceph tell command
Summary: [7.x Backport] - Error message is not descriptive for ceph tell command
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: CephFS
Version: 7.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 7.1z5
Assignee: Neeraj Pratap Singh
QA Contact: Hemanth Kumar
Rivka Pollack
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2356539 2164077
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-04-01 11:10 UTC by Hemanth Kumar
Modified: 2025-06-23 02:52 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-18.2.1-336
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.The `ceph tell` command now displays proper error messages for the wrong mds type Previously, the `ceph tell` command did not display a proper error message if the mds type was incorrect. As a result, the command failed with no error message, and it was difficult to understand what was wrong with the command. With this fix, the `ceph tell` command returns an appropriate error message, stating "unknown <type_name>" when an incorrect MDS type is used.
Clone Of: 2164077
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-06-23 02:51:56 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 67301 0 None None None 2025-04-16 09:33:16 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-11010 0 None None None 2025-04-01 11:11:32 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2025:9335 0 None None None 2025-06-23 02:51:59 UTC

Description Hemanth Kumar 2025-04-01 11:10:35 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2164077 +++
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2025-06-23 02:51:56 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.1 security and bug fix updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:9335
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.