Spec URL: http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3.spec SRPM URL: http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-3.3.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Zope 3 web application server framework Zope 3 is a redesign of Zope 2 and improves the Zope development experience through the use of a "component architecture". For the time being, Fedora Extras already has a Zope 2 package. I've tried to make this `zope3' package to be 100% stackable with the existing `zope' package.
Binary packages are also available: http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-3.3.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-instance-3.3.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-doc-3.3.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-devel-3.3.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm
None of these links seem to be valid.
Fixed.
Minor rpmlint complaints: ./zope3.spec:13: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{zope_pkgname} Change to /usr/%{_lib}/%{zope_pkgname} ./zope3.spec:101: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -rf %{buildroot} I see this was taken from the original zope 2.10.x spec, this should be removed. ./zope3.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 24) Simple to change. Make sure that you are using one method throughout the spec. Also, version 3.4.0c1 is newest upstream (http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope3/3.4.0c1/Zope-3.4.0c1.tgz), and curious on how this package and python-zope-interface might/could interact. I'm not happy (rpmbuild fails with lib change) with the directory structure that it creates under /usr/${_lib} either (e.g. /usr/lib64/zope3/lib64/python/BTrees/_OOBTree.so, would be nice to integrate more with %{python_sitearch} if possible), I imagine something like (for my given example) /usr/lib64/python2.5/zope/BTrees/_OOBTree.so would be more appropriate. It's been a while since anyone has commented on this, does this have any backing? I'm slightly interested as I've wanted to work with Zope and I re-build the f6 packages for use on CentOS.
I'm not very intersted in Zope these days, thus you could continue on your own.
I'll take over from here then. I've already started looking at removing the non-Zope pieces and have contacted the zope-dev mailing list. I'll be renaming the package to zope, and will make a zope2 (this version is still under-going independent development) at some later time. If you really aren't interested in keeping up with this, I suppose you could remove yourself from the CC list so you don't get all the emails that this will generate.
So is anything happening with this ticket? Honestly since Eugene has indicated that he doesn't want to be involved, and as far as I know, zope can't actually work in any supported release of Fedora because they all have python 2.5, I'm just going to close this. Timothy, if you do still want to pursue this, please open your own review ticket with fresh packages. Thanks.
Suggestion, if you need Python 2.4 you should open a review in rhe rpmfussion project, because they have a compat-python-2.4 package which you ma need for zope.