Bug 235928 - xemacs tabify/untabify not working
Summary: xemacs tabify/untabify not working
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xemacs
Version: 6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ville Skyttä
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-04-10 20:40 UTC by Tim Taiwanese Liim
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-11 15:07:08 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tim Taiwanese Liim 2007-04-10 20:40:43 UTC
Description of problem:
    The tabify/untabify command disappears in FC6.  It was available 
    in FC5 (xemacs 21.4 (patch 19)).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
    xemacs-packages-base-20060510-3.fc6
    xemacs-21.5.27-8.fc6
    xemacs-common-21.5.27-8.fc6
    XEmacs 21.5  (beta27) "fiddleheads" (linux, Mule) of Thu Jan 25 2007 on hammer2
    [version 21.5.27 of May 2006]

How reproducible:
    always

Steps to Reproduce:
    1. start xemacs
    2. M-x tabify
  
Actual results:
    - tabify unrecognized.  Same for untabify.

Expected results:
    - command tabify should be available.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Tim Taiwanese Liim 2007-04-11 02:53:42 UTC
Some other commands that are missing since FC5:
    display-time
    vc-load-vc-hooks
Maybe they are missing for a good reason that I don't understand.

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2007-04-11 03:20:50 UTC
I suspect you're missing some xemacs-sumo packages since they're not
all installed by default any more.

Comment 3 Ville Skyttä 2007-04-11 15:07:08 UTC
Right, install the xemacs-packages-extra package.  It's regrettable that during
the FC5->FC6 upgrade, xemacs-packages-extra was not pulled in for people who had
xemacs-sumo installed.

Comment 4 Tim Taiwanese Liim 2007-04-11 15:28:54 UTC
Thanks!  Yes xemacs-packages-extra solved the issue.  Yes it's
rather hard for users to guess which xemacs-related rpms to pull in.



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.