Bug 2359825 - [7.1z backport] rgw: tail objects are wrongly deleted in copy_object
Summary: [7.1z backport] rgw: tail objects are wrongly deleted in copy_object
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 8.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: 7.1z5
Assignee: Matt Benjamin (redhat)
QA Contact: Chaithra
Rivka Pollack
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2356678
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-04-15 18:03 UTC by Matt Benjamin (redhat)
Modified: 2025-10-22 04:25 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-18.2.1-339
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Tail objects no longer wrongly deleted with `copy-object` Previously, there was a reference count invariant on tail objects that was not maintained when an object was copied to itself. This caused the existing object was changed, rather than copied. As a result, references to tail objects were being decremented. When the refcount on tail objects dropped to 0, they were deleted during the next garbage collection (GC) cycle. With this fix, the refcount on tail objects is no longer decremented when completing a copy-to-self.
Clone Of: 2356678
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-06-23 02:52:06 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-11185 0 None None None 2025-04-15 18:05:47 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 7126824 0 None None None 2025-06-23 17:13:03 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2025:9335 0 None None None 2025-06-23 02:52:09 UTC

Description Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2025-04-15 18:03:47 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2356678 +++
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2025-06-23 02:52:06 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.1 security and bug fix updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:9335
Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2025-10-22 04:25:05 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.