Bug 2360974
| Summary: | [GSS] Ceph RGW - LC ERROR on expiration of delete marker with null versionId | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Bob Emerson <roemerso> | |
| Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin> | |
| Status: | ON_QA --- | QA Contact: | Madhavi Kasturi <mkasturi> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 7.1 | CC: | bkunal, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, etamir, jcaratza, mbenjamin, rocapa, rsachere | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | etamir:
needinfo?
(roemerso) etamir: needinfo? (mbenjamin) rsachere: needinfo? (mbenjamin) rocapa: needinfo? (mbenjamin) rsachere: needinfo? (bkunal) jcaratza: needinfo? (mbenjamin) rsachere: needinfo? (mbenjamin) rsachere: needinfo? (jcaratza) |
|
| Target Release: | 7.1z9 | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 2381933 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | ||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 2381933 | |||
|
Description
Bob Emerson
2025-04-18 14:40:27 UTC
This comment was flagged as spam, view the edit history to see the original text if required. Hello Justin, I see on the 19th we did talk about a followup on this BZ as there where same things discussed about a PR link, are we all good on this BZ? Thank you, BR Raimund Hi Justin, when I brought this up on the program call, IIRC you took a look and mentioned that it was set to `MODIFIED` without an PR Link. And Rachana put it down in the document with `Needs follow up as it's modified without PR link. Justin will follow up with`. I was wrong about the date, it was not the 19th, but the 15th z-stream call. I'd appreciate if we can make sure this fix get's into 7.1z9 Thank you, Raimund |