Bug 2362171 - Review Request: rust-chromaterm - Yet another crate for terminal colors
Summary: Review Request: rust-chromaterm - Yet another crate for terminal colors
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: blinxen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://crates.io/crates/chromaterm
Whiteboard: Trivial
Depends On:
Blocks: 2361953 2361954
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-04-24 20:11 UTC by Ben Beasley
Modified: 2025-05-21 02:17 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-05-05 18:44:12 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
h-k-81: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Configuration file for rust2rpm (97 bytes, text/plain)
2025-04-24 20:11 UTC, Ben Beasley
no flags Details

Description Ben Beasley 2025-04-24 20:11:46 UTC
Created attachment 2087079 [details]
Configuration file for rust2rpm

Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/rust-chromaterm.spec
SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/rust-chromaterm-0.1.0-1.fc42.src.rpm
Description: Yet another crate for terminal colors.
Fedora Account System Username: music

This is a new dependency for rust-gengo/rust-gengo-bin 0.13, replacing the dependency on rust-owo-colors.

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-24 20:16:29 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8964565
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2362171-rust-chromaterm/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08964565-rust-chromaterm/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-24 20:17:22 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8964564
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2362171-rust-chromaterm/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08964564-rust-chromaterm/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 blinxen 2025-05-05 18:09:07 UTC
Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

✅ package contains only permissible content
✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
✅ test suite is run and all unit tests pass
✅ latest version of the crate is packaged
✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora
✅ license files are included with %license in %files
✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

Comment 4 Ben Beasley 2025-05-05 18:14:10 UTC
Thank you for the review! I will get this imported, build it in Rawhide, and branch and push to all branches that have rust-gengo/rust-gengo-bin so that you can include it in the same side tag as the upcoming gix update.

Comment 5 Ben Beasley 2025-05-05 18:25:48 UTC
https://release-monitoring.org/project/377976/

Comment 6 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-05-05 18:26:18 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-chromaterm

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-05-05 18:41:24 UTC
FEDORA-2025-be5544a966 (rust-chromaterm-0.1.0-1.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-be5544a966

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2025-05-05 18:44:12 UTC
FEDORA-2025-be5544a966 (rust-chromaterm-0.1.0-1.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2025-05-12 18:41:43 UTC
FEDORA-2025-f25a064b91 (rust-chromaterm-0.1.0-2.fc42, rust-gengo-0.13.0-1.fc42, and 1 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-f25a064b91

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2025-05-12 18:48:13 UTC
FEDORA-2025-79e7260f47 (rust-chromaterm-0.1.0-2.fc41, rust-gengo-0.13.0-1.fc41, and 1 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-79e7260f47

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2025-05-13 01:57:46 UTC
FEDORA-2025-f25a064b91 has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-f25a064b91`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-f25a064b91

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2025-05-13 02:55:28 UTC
FEDORA-2025-79e7260f47 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-79e7260f47`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-79e7260f47

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2025-05-21 02:05:24 UTC
FEDORA-2025-79e7260f47 (rust-chromaterm-0.1.0-2.fc41, rust-gengo-0.13.0-1.fc41, and 1 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2025-05-21 02:17:06 UTC
FEDORA-2025-f25a064b91 (rust-chromaterm-0.1.0-2.fc42, rust-gengo-0.13.0-1.fc42, and 1 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.