Bug 2362270 - Review Request: yumex - Yum Extender graphical package management tool
Summary: Review Request: yumex - Yum Extender graphical package management tool
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/timlau/yumex-ng
Whiteboard: Unretirement
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-04-25 08:55 UTC by Tim Lauridsen
Modified: 2025-04-27 16:37 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8966473 to 8966615 (1.66 KB, patch)
2025-04-25 10:09 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8966615 to 8966667 (642 bytes, patch)
2025-04-25 10:51 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8966667 to 8967061 (3.00 KB, patch)
2025-04-25 12:15 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8967061 to 8967105 (514 bytes, patch)
2025-04-25 12:36 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8967105 to 8967335 (844 bytes, patch)
2025-04-25 14:09 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Tim Lauridsen 2025-04-25 08:55:55 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/timlau/yumex-ng/refs/heads/5.2.x/yumex.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/timlau/yumex-ng/releases/download/yumex-5.2.0/yumex-5.2.0-1.fc42.src.rpm
Description: Yum Extender graphical package management tool
Fedora Account System Username: timlau

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 09:06:14 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8966473
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2362270-yumex/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08966473-yumex/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Not a valid SPDX expression 'GPLv3+'. It seems that you are using the old Fedora license abbreviations. Try `license-fedora2spdx' for converting it to SPDX.
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1
- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yumex
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
- Systemd user unit service file(s) in yumex-updater
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_user_units
- icons in yumex, yumex-updater
- desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in yumex
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Scriptlets&oldid=494555#desktop-database

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 10:09:36 UTC
Created attachment 2087176 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8966473 to 8966615

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 10:09:38 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8966615
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2362270-yumex/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08966615-yumex/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yumex
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
- Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/yumex/diff.txt
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/
- Systemd user unit service file(s) in yumex-updater
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_user_units
- icons in yumex, yumex-updater
- desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in yumex
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Scriptlets&oldid=494555#desktop-database

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Tim Lauridsen 2025-04-25 10:41:35 UTC
Spec URL: https://github.com/timlau/yumex-ng/releases/download/fedora-review/yumex.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/timlau/yumex-ng/releases/download/fedora-review/yumex-5.2.0-2.fc42.src.rpm

- removed update-desktop-database calls
- build SPRM with upstream sources, so MD5SUM will match
- the name should be ok, as this is an un-retirement of the old yumex package, that was maintained by me, back in the days

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 10:51:52 UTC
Created attachment 2087178 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8966615 to 8966667

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 10:51:54 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8966667
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2362270-yumex/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08966667-yumex/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yumex
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
- Systemd user unit service file(s) in yumex-updater
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_user_units
- icons in yumex, yumex-updater

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 9 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 12:15:21 UTC
Created attachment 2087190 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8966667 to 8967061

Comment 10 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 12:15:23 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8967061
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2362270-yumex/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08967061-yumex/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yumex
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
- Systemd user unit service file(s) in yumex-updater
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_user_units
- icons in yumex, yumex-updater

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 12 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 12:36:05 UTC
Created attachment 2087192 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8967061 to 8967105

Comment 13 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 12:36:07 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8967105
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2362270-yumex/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08967105-yumex/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yumex
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
- Systemd user unit service file(s) in yumex-updater
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_user_units

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 15 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 14:09:33 UTC
Created attachment 2087232 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8967105 to 8967335

Comment 16 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-25 14:09:36 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8967335
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2362270-yumex/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08967335-yumex/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yumex
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
- Systemd user unit service file(s) in yumex-updater
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_user_units

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 17 Neal Gompa 2025-04-25 22:35:44 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 18 Tim Lauridsen 2025-04-27 16:37:39 UTC
Spec URL: https://github.com/timlau/yumex-ng/releases/download/fedora-review/yumex.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/timlau/yumex-ng/releases/download/fedora-review/yumex-5.2.0-1.fc42.src.rpm

- changed to use %autorelease & %autochangelog as preferred for new fedora packages.
- removed old obsoletes of yumex-dnf, not need as there is no relation or upgrade path from yumex-dnf to current yumex (both have been retired in Fedora for years)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.