Bug 2362686
| Summary: | [CephFS - FScrypt] Prompt a error/warning message during encrypt if unsupported encryption algorithm specified in fscrypt.conf file | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | sumr |
| Component: | CephFS | Assignee: | Christopher Hoffman <choffman> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | sumr |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Rivka Pollack <rpollack> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.1 | CC: | ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, choffman, gfarnum, mamohan, ngangadh, rpollack, vshankar |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 9.0 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-20.1.0-18 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.Unsupported encryption algorithms now return an error on CephFS
Previously, the CephFS userspace did not validate encryption algorithms when setting up `fscrypt`. Only `AES-256-XTS` and `AES-256-CTS` were supported, but if a different algorithm was requested, CephFS silently used the default supported algorithm without notifying the user.
With this fix, a validation check ensures that only supported encryption algorithms are allowed when setting up `fscrypt` on CephFS. If an unsupported algorithm is supplied, the system returns an `EINVAL` error code.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2026-01-29 06:55:34 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2388233 | ||
|
Description
sumr
2025-04-28 11:15:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 9.0 Security and Enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1536 |