Bug 2362926 - Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc-re - Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask
Summary: Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc-re - Adds support for creating XML-RPC A...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-04-29 14:35 UTC by Aurelien Bompard
Modified: 2025-05-18 14:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Aurelien Bompard 2025-04-29 14:35:59 UTC
Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-flask-xml-rpc-re/python-flask-xml-rpc-re.spec
SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-flask-xml-rpc-re/python-flask-xml-rpc-re-0.1.4-1.fc42.src.rpm
Description:
Flask-XML-RPC-Re adds XML-RPC support to Flask. This way, you can provide simple APIs easily accessible from almost any programming language.
Fedora Account System Username: abompard

Comment 1 Ben Beasley 2025-05-18 14:57:44 UTC
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(nose)
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages

Since python-nose has been deprecated since Fedora 32 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose), you cannot depend on it. Since python-nose was retired for Fedora 43 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePythonNose), you *really* cannot depend on it. Please find another way to run the tests.

Please consider not building and shipping the Sphinx-generated HTML documentation; as noted in bug 2006555, there are issues with bundled JavaScript, fonts, and so on. Recent FESCo decisions have made it more practical to handle this, but you still have to account for all the licenses of everything copied into the binary RPMs by Sphinx.

As this is a new package, please use the current Python guidelines https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/, based on pyproject-rpm-macros, rather than https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python_201x/.

I am sure you are aware that this package is dead upstream, with the last commit seven years ago. This doesn’t prevent packaging it, but it does mean you should probably think twice about whether you really need it, and it means you shoulder a greater burden on to deal with bugs and compatibility issues with no upstream assistance.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.