Bug 2364015 - F43FailsToInstall: koji-builder
Summary: F43FailsToInstall: koji-builder
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: koji
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mike McLean
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F43FailsToInstall, RAWHIDEFailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-05-05 06:26 UTC by Fedora Fails To Install
Modified: 2025-06-16 18:15 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fedora Fails To Install 2025-05-05 06:26:00 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/

Your package (koji) Fails To Install in Fedora 43:

can't install koji-builder:
  - nothing provides group(kojibuilder) needed by koji-builder-1.35.3-1.fc43.noarch
  - nothing provides user(kojibuilder) needed by koji-builder-1.35.3-1.fc43.noarch
  
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.


If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.


P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock:

    $ mock -r fedora-43-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install koji-builder


P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages

Thanks!

Comment 1 Fedora Fails To Install 2025-05-12 11:23:08 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/

This package fails to install and maintainers are advised to take one of the following actions:

 - Fix this bug and close this bugzilla once the update makes it to the repository.
   (The same script that posted this comment will eventually close this bugzilla
   when the fixed package reaches the repository, so you don't have to worry about it.)

or

 - Move this bug to ASSIGNED if you plan on fixing this, but simply haven't done so yet.

or

 - Orphan the package if you no longer plan to maintain it.


If you do not take one of these actions, the process at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs will continue.
This package may be orphaned in 7+ weeks.
This is the first reminder (step 3) from the policy.

Don't hesitate to ask for help on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ if you are unsure how to fix this bug.

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2025-05-12 14:50:02 UTC
More sysusers stuff.

Comment 3 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2025-05-12 19:26:31 UTC
koji-builder has an "owned directory":
$ rpm -qplv koji-builder-1.35.3-1.fc43.noarch.rpm |rg -v 'root +root'
drwxr-xr-x    2 kojibuil kojibuil                    0 Mar 18 01:00 /etc/mock/koji
So it has an autogenerated req:
$ rpm -qpR koji-builder-1.35.3-1.fc43.noarch.rpm |rg group
group(kojibuilder)
Apparently nothing satisfies this req.

And looking at the spec file, I don't see no sysusers files nor any user creation scriptlets…
Somebody needs to add the sysusers file. Or maybe the ownership
of the directory can be dropped. Is it really necessary for the daemon
to write there?

Comment 4 Fedora Fails To Install 2025-06-03 17:09:39 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/

This package fails to install and maintainers are advised to take one of the following actions:

 - Fix this bug and close this bugzilla once the update makes it to the repository.
   (The same script that posted this comment will eventually close this bugzilla
   when the fixed package reaches the repository, so you don't have to worry about it.)

or

 - Move this bug to ASSIGNED if you plan on fixing this, but simply haven't done so yet.

or

 - Orphan the package if you no longer plan to maintain it.


If you do not take one of these actions, the process at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs will continue.
This package may be orphaned in 4+ weeks.
This is the second reminder (step 4) from the policy.

Don't hesitate to ask for help on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ if you are unsure how to fix this bug.

Comment 5 Mike McLean 2025-06-16 17:56:22 UTC
> And looking at the spec file, I don't see no sysusers files nor any user creation scriptlets…

There is an old %pre scriptlet that calls useradd, both in the Fedora spec and upstream.

Comment 6 Mike McLean 2025-06-16 18:15:06 UTC
> Is it really necessary for the daemon to write there?

Yes. Though this is less about the daemon itself (which runs as root) as the underlying execution of of the mock utility (which kojid runs as kojibuilder by default).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.