Bug 2365640 - Review Request: python-aiolimiter - An efficient implementation of a rate limiter for asyncio
Summary: Review Request: python-aiolimiter - An efficient implementation of a rate lim...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Kadlčík
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/mjpieters/aiolimiter
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-05-12 14:45 UTC by Stephen Gallagher
Modified: 2025-05-21 02:19 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-05-13 02:04:15 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
jkadlcik: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9024065 to 9024306 (1.71 KB, patch)
2025-05-12 15:55 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Stephen Gallagher 2025-05-12 14:45:38 UTC
Spec URL: https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/python-aiolimiter/python-aiolimiter.spec
SRPM URL: https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/python-aiolimiter/python-aiolimiter-1.2.1-2.fc43.src.rpm
Description:
An efficient implementation of a rate limiter for asyncio.

This project implements the Leaky bucket algorithm, giving you precise control over the rate a code section can be entered.
Fedora Account System Username: sgallagh

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2025-05-12 14:56:57 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9024065
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2365640-python-aiolimiter/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09024065-python-aiolimiter/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- python3-toml is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
- License file LICENSE.txt is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-05-12 15:55:51 UTC
Created attachment 2089532 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9024065 to 9024306

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2025-05-12 15:55:54 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9024306
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2365640-python-aiolimiter/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09024306-python-aiolimiter/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- python3-toml is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Jakub Kadlčík 2025-05-12 16:08:52 UTC
Thank you for the package Stephen,

> Issues:
> =======
> - Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
>   Note: python3-toml is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
>   See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
>   guidelines/deprecating-packages/

This is a test-only dependency, behind a conditional, and with a proposed patch to the upstream. Let's not block the review by this.


> W: summary-ended-with-dot An efficient implementation of a rate limiter for asyncio.
> E: description-line-too-long This project implements the Leaky bucket algorithm, giving you precise control over the rate a code section can be entered.

Rpmlint found these two easy-to-fix issues. Can be done post-review.


> BuildRequires:  python3-toml
> %if 0%{?rhel} < 10
> BuildRequires:  python3-toml
> %endif  # rhel9

Should there be the first python3-toml? Also, the %endif comment should probably say rhel10


All minor things, I am giving +1 here.




Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
  Note: python3-toml is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/deprecating-packages/


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "MIT License", "Unknown or generated". 23 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-
     rpmbuild/results/python-aiolimiter/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-
     packages, /usr/lib/python3.13
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 5634 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[?]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
     Note: %define requiring justification: %define autorelease(e:s:pb:n)
     %{?-p:0.}%{lua:
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-aiolimiter-1.2.1-4.fc43.noarch.rpm
          python-aiolimiter-1.2.1-4.fc43.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp09cwahh1')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

python-aiolimiter.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot An efficient implementation of a rate limiter for asyncio.
python3-aiolimiter.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot An efficient implementation of a rate limiter for asyncio.
python-aiolimiter.src: E: description-line-too-long This project implements the Leaky bucket algorithm, giving you precise control over the rate a code section can be entered.
python3-aiolimiter.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This project implements the Leaky bucket algorithm, giving you precise control over the rate a code section can be entered.
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings, 11 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.3 s




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "python3-aiolimiter".
There are no files to process nor additional arguments.
Nothing to do, aborting.
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/mjpieters/aiolimiter/archive/v1.2.1/aiolimiter-1.2.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : faa4d74d9354352f6db2c98c1dca2a7bbc2ea50e51fe5899c9b9b257b1eff2ee
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : faa4d74d9354352f6db2c98c1dca2a7bbc2ea50e51fe5899c9b9b257b1eff2ee


Requires
--------
python3-aiolimiter (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)



Provides
--------
python3-aiolimiter:
    python-aiolimiter
    python3-aiolimiter
    python3.13-aiolimiter
    python3.13dist(aiolimiter)
    python3dist(aiolimiter)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name python-aiolimiter --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: C/C++, SugarActivity, Java, Haskell, fonts, R, Ocaml, Perl, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 7 Stephen Gallagher 2025-05-12 16:43:04 UTC
(In reply to Jakub Kadlčík from comment #6)
> Thank you for the package Stephen,
> 
> > Issues:
> > =======
> > - Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
> >   Note: python3-toml is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
> >   See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
> >   guidelines/deprecating-packages/
> 
> This is a test-only dependency, behind a conditional, and with a proposed
> patch to the upstream. Let's not block the review by this.
> 

I think that was due to the other issue below.

> 
> > W: summary-ended-with-dot An efficient implementation of a rate limiter for asyncio.
> > E: description-line-too-long This project implements the Leaky bucket algorithm, giving you precise control over the rate a code section can be entered.
> 
> Rpmlint found these two easy-to-fix issues. Can be done post-review.
> 
> 
> > BuildRequires:  python3-toml
> > %if 0%{?rhel} < 10
> > BuildRequires:  python3-toml
> > %endif  # rhel9
> 
> Should there be the first python3-toml? Also, the %endif comment should
> probably say rhel10
> 

I put that there while I was testing and forgot to remove it before pushing the latest spec/SRPM. I just re-tested without it to make sure I didn't get false successes earlier.

The `rhel9` comment there was intentional; the test is for "less than RHEL 10". That said, I removed it because the version of RPM on RHEL 9 apparently doesn't accept it.

Comment 8 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-05-12 16:44:24 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-aiolimiter

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2025-05-12 17:17:38 UTC
FEDORA-2025-158324aaaf (python-aiolimiter-1.2.1-7.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-158324aaaf

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2025-05-12 17:17:38 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-68b6db6ea8 (python-aiolimiter-1.2.1-7.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-68b6db6ea8

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2025-05-12 17:17:39 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-168213d893 (python-aiolimiter-1.2.1-7.el9) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-168213d893

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2025-05-13 02:04:15 UTC
FEDORA-2025-a5696ec745 (python-aiolimiter-1.2.1-7.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2025-05-13 02:23:21 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-168213d893 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-168213d893

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2025-05-13 03:49:38 UTC
FEDORA-2025-158324aaaf (python-aiolimiter-1.2.1-7.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2025-05-13 03:58:36 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-68b6db6ea8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-68b6db6ea8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2025-05-21 00:51:53 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-168213d893 (python-aiolimiter-1.2.1-7.el9) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2025-05-21 02:19:35 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-68b6db6ea8 (python-aiolimiter-1.2.1-7.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.