Spec URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/ipv6toolkit.spec SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/ipv6toolkit-2.2-1.src.rpm Description: The SI6 Networks IPv6 toolkit is a suite of IPv6 security assessment and and troubleshooting tools. It can be used to assess the security of IPv6 networks, evaluate the resilience of IPv6 devices by subjecting them to real-world attacks, and troubleshoot IPv6 networking issues. The toolkit comprises tools ranging from packet-crafting tools for sending arbitrary Neighbor Discovery packets to a comprehensive IPv6 network scanning tool. Fedora Account System Username: robert Note: The package is not only intended for Fedora, but also for all active EPEL branches.
There seems to be some problem with the following file. SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/ipv6toolkit-2.2-1.src.rpm Fetching it results in a 404 Not Found error. Please make sure the URL is correct and publicly available. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Spec URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/ipv6toolkit.spec SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/ipv6toolkit-2.2-1.src.rpm
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9050611 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2366587-ipv6toolkit/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09050611-ipv6toolkit/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Documentation is under GFDL. See: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2366587-ipv6toolkit/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09050611-ipv6toolkit/fedora-review/licensecheck.txt Errors returned by fedora-review: ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/addr6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/flow6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/frag6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/icmp6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/jumbo6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/mldq6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/na6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ni6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ns6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/path6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ra6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/rd6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/rs6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/scan6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/tcp6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/udp6
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #4) > Documentation is under GFDL. See: > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora- > review-2366587-ipv6toolkit/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09050611-ipv6toolkit/fedora- > review/licensecheck.txt Oh dear, a locally run licensecheck(1) did not find this. I will walk through this manually. > Errors returned by fedora-review: > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/addr6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/flow6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/frag6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/icmp6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/jumbo6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/mldq6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/na6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ni6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ns6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/path6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ra6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/rd6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/rs6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/scan6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/tcp6 > ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/udp6 Good point, I'll have a look to it.
Spec URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/ipv6toolkit.spec SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.src.rpm 1. License tag has been corrected and a breakdown is in the spec file, too. However, there is no "RealNetworks Public Source License" involved, the license check somehow gets (wrongly) triggered by the word "real" in the man page. 2. The missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid error is a detection mistake in rpmlint: $ grep -r -E set[ug]id ipv6toolkit-2.2 ipv6toolkit-2.2/tools/libipv6.c: If the real UID is not root, we setuid() and setgid() to that user and group, releasing superuser ipv6toolkit-2.2/tools/libipv6.c: privileges. Otherwise, if the real UID is 0, we try to setuid() to "nobody", releasing superuser ipv6toolkit-2.2/tools/libipv6.c: if (setgid(rgid) == -1) { ipv6toolkit-2.2/tools/libipv6.c: if (setuid(ruid) == -1) { ipv6toolkit-2.2/tools/libipv6.c: if (setgid(pwdptr->pw_gid) == -1) { ipv6toolkit-2.2/tools/libipv6.c: if (setuid(pwdptr->pw_uid) == -1) { $ See also: https://github.com/fgont/ipv6toolkit/blob/master/tools/libipv6.c#L1841 From my point of view rpmlint gets confused by the if/else conditions and matches the middle part (setuid() in if and setgid() in else).
Created attachment 2090040 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 9050611 to 9052698
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9052698 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2366587-ipv6toolkit/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09052698-ipv6toolkit/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License 2.0", "GNU Free Documentation License v1.3 or later", "*No copyright* GNU Free Documentation License v1.3 or later", "GNU Free Documentation License v1.3 or later and/or RealNetworks Public Source License", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later". 35 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fedora- packaging/reviews/ipv6toolkit/2366587-ipv6toolkit/licensecheck.txt [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 11191 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 2734080 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.fc43.x86_64.rpm ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.fc43.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.6.1 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpokzyk7ar')] checks: 32, packages: 2 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary messi ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/addr6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/flow6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/frag6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/icmp6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/jumbo6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/mldq6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/na6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ni6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ns6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/path6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ra6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/rd6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/rs6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/scan6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/tcp6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/udp6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/ipv6toolkit/rir-database.csv /usr/share/ipv6toolkit/dns-tld-database.csv 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 16 errors, 2 warnings, 7 filtered, 16 badness; has taken 1.0 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: ipv6toolkit-debuginfo-2.2-2.fc43.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.6.1 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp0qx4bf3o')] checks: 32, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 56 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.9 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 2 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/addr6 /lib64/libpcap.so.1 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary messi ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/addr6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/flow6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/frag6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/icmp6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/jumbo6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/mldq6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/na6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ni6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ns6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/path6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/ra6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/rd6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/rs6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/scan6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/tcp6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/udp6 ipv6toolkit.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/ipv6toolkit/rir-database.csv /usr/share/ipv6toolkit/dns-tld-database.csv 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 16 errors, 3 warnings, 59 filtered, 16 badness; has taken 5.3 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/fgont/ipv6toolkit/archive/refs/tags/v2.2.tar.gz#/ipv6toolkit-2.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b6a1af3d3cf417a81dbb4cd99cf710d16a62338be4bfbbb14b8d1cb298849338 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b6a1af3d3cf417a81dbb4cd99cf710d16a62338be4bfbbb14b8d1cb298849338 Requires -------- ipv6toolkit (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/perl config(ipv6toolkit) curl glibc libc.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpcap.so.1()(64bit) perl(Crypt::X509) perl(IPC::Open3) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Net::DNS) perl(Net::IP) perl(Socket) perl(constant) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- ipv6toolkit: config(ipv6toolkit) ipv6toolkit ipv6toolkit(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2366587 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: C/C++, Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: PHP, Java, R, fonts, Ocaml, Haskell, Perl, Python, SugarActivity Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH Comments: a) Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=132872332 b) Consider using %autorelease and %autochangelog macros C) Approved.
Review of one of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366966 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358245 would be appreciated if time and expertise allow.
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ipv6toolkit
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-56142fd809 (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.el9) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-56142fd809
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9eaf496425 (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9eaf496425
FEDORA-2025-a258fadc8d (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-a258fadc8d
FEDORA-2025-f80beb5fa5 (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-f80beb5fa5
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9eaf496425 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9eaf496425 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2025-f80beb5fa5 has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-f80beb5fa5 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-f80beb5fa5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-56142fd809 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-56142fd809 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2025-a258fadc8d has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-a258fadc8d \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-a258fadc8d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-16a8d9d16e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-16a8d9d16e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9a36e69848 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9a36e69848 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9eaf496425 (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2025-a258fadc8d (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-56142fd809 (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.el9) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2025-f80beb5fa5 (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-16a8d9d16e (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.el10_0) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9a36e69848 (ipv6toolkit-2.2-2.el8) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.