Bug 2370031 - Please branch and build fd-find (rust-fd-find) in epel10.0
Summary: Please branch and build fd-find (rust-fd-find) in epel10.0
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: rust-fd-find
Version: epel10
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ben Beasley
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-06-03 14:55 UTC by Tim Skirvin
Modified: 2025-11-10 03:35 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rust-fd-find-10.3.0-1.el10_0
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-11-10 03:35:36 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tim Skirvin 2025-06-03 14:55:32 UTC
Please branch and build fd-find (and rust-fd-find) in epel10.0.  It's in epel10.1.  I'm not sure of the distinction?

Comment 1 Petasus Ruber 2025-06-08 09:13:34 UTC
The difference is because EPEL 10 is built against each minor version of RHEL 10: https://carlwgeorge.fedorapeople.org/presentations/epel-10-overview-2024-f40-release-party.pdf

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2025-06-16 07:17:09 UTC
Exactly, EPEL 10.1 is currently being built against CentOS Stream 10, which will eventually become RHEL 10.1.

At this point in the release cycle, new packages are - by default - only added to EPEL 10.1+, and adding them to EPEL 10.0 too is additional work. Given that there is now a request for that, we can do this - though I can't promise how quickly. :)

Comment 3 Ben Beasley 2025-11-01 00:05:16 UTC
I’ve looked into this, and I think it can be done as follows:

argmax: patch to allow the current epel10.0 version, 0.3.1
etcetera: branch from epel10.1
faccess: branch from epel10.1
lscolors: branch epel10.1
nix: patch to allow the current epel10.0 version, 0.29.0
tempfile: patch to allow the current epel10.0 version, 3.17.1
tikv-jemallocator/tikv-jemallocator-sys: patch out the custom allocator, as this package was doing until very recently, since jemalloc was never built for epel10.0

I will need to double-check this with some test builds before actually shipping something, but I think I can get this done in the next day or so.

Comment 4 Ben Beasley 2025-11-01 00:16:23 UTC
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #3)
> etcetera: branch from epel10.1

That one should be: patch to allow 0.8.0.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-11-01 10:38:52 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4a5715a7df (rust-argmax-0.3.1-8.el10_0, rust-faccess-0.2.4-9.el10_0, and 2 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4a5715a7df

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2025-11-02 03:00:52 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4a5715a7df has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4a5715a7df

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-11-10 03:35:36 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4a5715a7df (rust-argmax-0.3.1-8.el10_0, rust-faccess-0.2.4-9.el10_0, and 2 more) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.