<kgonzale> too whom it may concern... <kgonzale> Why are only parts of webqa showing that they are RHN 5.0.1? <kgonzale> and other parts showing 5.0.0? <mizmo> kgonzale: could be java showing one thing, perl another <kgonzale> So the problem is, the part I was to test is stil lshowing 5.0.0 :) <kgonzale> Systems -> Details -> Properties is showing 5.0.1q <kgonzale> er <kgonzale> 5.0.1 <kgonzale> Systems -> Details -> Satellite is showing 5.0.0 <kgonzale> is there a 5.0.1 code revision for that page or section that I could test against? <kgonzale> mizmo: sure enough, one is .do, one is .pxt <mizmo> sounds like a bug, which is out of date, java or perl? <kgonzale> the .pxt <mizmo> (im sure someone just forgot to update the release version text and not the actual code version) <kgonzale> ahh <kgonzale> ok
This was a procedural problem - we didn't push the perl RPMs into QA in the last push because there wasn't any web-side code change. That meant we failed to pick up the property-file that defines the versionso the .pxt pages still have the old file. This will be fixed when we next push RPMs into WEBQA, which will be Monday 23-APR.
Pushed and ON_QA now - both .do and .pxt pages now show 5.0.1
verified.
On Stage.
Closed for RHN 501 Hosted.