Bug 2372800 - Review Request: xosview - X11 system monitor
Summary: Review Request: xosview - X11 system monitor
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-06-13 20:57 UTC by Akiyoshi Kurita
Modified: 2025-06-19 17:26 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-06-19 17:26:02 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Akiyoshi Kurita 2025-06-13 20:57:14 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-13 20:57:20 UTC
The ticket summary is not in the correct format.
Expected:

    Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here>

Found:

    Review Request: xosview – xosview system monitor for EPEL9 (AlmaLinux 9)

As a consequence, the package name cannot be parsed and submitted to
be automatically build. Please modify the ticket summary and trigger a
build by typing [fedora-review-service-build].


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Akiyoshi Kurita 2025-06-15 12:16:32 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 3 Carl George 🤠 2025-06-19 17:26:02 UTC
Package reviews are not the correct way to request Fedora packages be added to EPEL.  You've already been provided instructions for how to do this properly in several other locations.  Please take the time to read those instructions and stop excessively replying with AI-generated nonsense.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.