Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 237313 - CVE-2007-0243 GIF buffer overflow
CVE-2007-0243 GIF buffer overflow
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification: Red Hat
Component: IBMJava2-SDK (Show other bugs)
2.1
All Linux
urgent Severity urgent
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Patrick Macdonald
reported=20070417,source=internet,imp...
: Security
Depends On: 236894
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2007-04-20 15:17 EDT by Thomas Fitzsimmons
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:06 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 1.3.1-11
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-05-01 13:57:38 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Thomas Fitzsimmons 2007-04-20 15:17:52 EDT 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #236894 +++

In January 2007 a flaw was found affecting the SUN JRE; "Buffer overflow in Sun
JDK and Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 5.0 Update 9 and earlier, SDK and JRE
1.4.2_12 and earlier, and SDK and JRE 1.3.1_18 and earlier allows applets to
gain privileges via a GIF image with a block with a 0 width field, which
triggers memory corruption."

On 17th April 2007 IBM updated their alerts page to note that this issue
affected the IBM JRE and was fixed in 1.5.0SR4

Also affects RHEL4Extras

-- Additional comment from fitzsim@redhat.com on 2007-04-18 13:58 EST --
I've requested updated tarballs from my IBM contact.  I'll see if I can get what
I need from the public IBM site in the mean time.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.