nmon is a performance monitoring tool for Linux that can display and log CPU, memory, disk, network, and other system resource usage. This package is based on the Fedora 43 version of nmon and adapted for EPEL 10. I am seeking a formal review and welcome feedback. Thank you, Akiyoshi Kurita (FAS: redadmin) Reproducible: Always
The ticket summary is not in the correct format. Expected: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here> Found: Review Request: nmon – Performance monitoring tool for Linux As a consequence, the package name cannot be parsed and submitted to be automatically build. Please modify the ticket summary and trigger a build by typing [fedora-review-service-build]. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Created attachment 2094491 [details] nmon 16p EPEL10 packaging: includes spec file, source RPM, and mock build log This archive contains the following files for nmon-16p EPEL10 packaging: - nmon.spec - nmon-16p-5.el10.src.rpm - build.log (from mock) The spec is adapted from Fedora 43. I’m requesting a formal review.
[fedora-review-service-build]
Sorry - not familiar with how long this automatic build takes, but we're also looking for nmon in EPEL10. Has the build been triggered (and in a queue)? [fedora-review-service-build]
No one is reviewing it at the moment, so it's on hold
Ok, ty @akito5623 for the explanation (and for making the request). Hopefully it comes through before 10.1 is released!
Package reviews are not the correct way to request existing Fedora packages be added to EPEL. You've been provided instructions on how to do this multiple times already. Please take the time to read them and follow the correct process. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/
Hello Carl, I apologize for following the wrong process. I’m still learning, and I understand that my trial-and-error approach may cause some inconvenience at times. I would appreciate it if you could kindly bear with me. Thank you for your understanding. Best regards, Akyoshi Kurita
@kei.aki - it looks like 16q-3 was pushed to stable in 10_1 a week ago, so they've already been working on it. https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/nmon/nmon/