Bug 2374402 - Review Request: bbox-fira-fonts - Fira is a new set of sans-serif fonts which focuses on legibility.
Summary: Review Request: bbox-fira-fonts - Fira is a new set of sans-serif fonts which...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sergio Correia
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-06-23 21:08 UTC by Mateus Rodrigues Costa
Modified: 2025-12-02 10:51 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
scorreia: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mateus Rodrigues Costa 2025-06-23 21:08:45 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mateusrodcosta/bbox-fira-fonts/fedora-42-x86_64/09201707-bbox-fira-sans-fonts/bbox-fira-fonts.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mateusrodcosta/bbox-fira-fonts/fedora-42-x86_64/09201707-bbox-fira-sans-fonts/bbox-fira-sans-fonts-4.301-1.fc42.src.rpm
Description: Originally designed to integrate with the character of Firefox OS, Fira is a new set of sans-serif fonts which focuses on legibility.
Fedora Account System Username: mateusrodcosta

---

This is a rename for mozilla-fira-sans-fonts, more info about the rationale for that can be found at issue 2308744.

Comment 1 Mateus Rodrigues Costa 2025-06-23 21:14:50 UTC
A few notes:

I plan to split the packages as follow:
* The spec will be called "bbox-fira-fonts" (I'm having issue with this)
* Sans and Mono will be "bbox-fira-sans-fonts" and "bbox-fira-mono-fonts" respectively
* Doc and all could be "bbox-fira-fonts-doc" and "bbox-fira-fonts-all" (I am not worrying too much about this)

I had issues with the %setup macro so I am using unzip manually. I also had issues with setting up OFL.txt for the license, so I ended with two copies.
The Obsoletes and Provides should be fine, as required for the rename.

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 15:42:08 UTC
Hello,
I do realize that this is possibly an old ticket. I am sorry that it hasn't been
reviewed yet. Let me trigger the Fedora Review Service to see if the package
builds successfully. Hopefully, a green check mark will attract some reviewer.

If I am resurrecting an old ticket that you are not interested in anymore, my
apologies, feel free to close it.

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 15:42:20 UTC
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are:

- You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description
  or any of your comments
- The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS
- The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified
  in the ticket summary


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.