Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 237846
ufraw: missing exiv2 support
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:12:02 EST
Sorry, had only previously tested if the rebuild works, not functionality. Rebuilding ufraw against exiv2-0.14 yields build.log containing: ... checking whether to read raw EXIF data using exiv2... yes checking for exiv2-config... no ... problem being, exiv2 >= 0.14 no longer includes exiv2-config I'll see about whipping up a patch for ufraw to use pkg-config instead.
Sigh, if only it were that simple: ... nikon_curve.c:2026: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -O3 -I/usr/include/gimp-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT ufraw_exiv2.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/ufraw_exiv2.Tpo" -c -o ufraw_exiv2.o ufraw_exiv2.cc; \ then mv -f ".deps/ufraw_exiv2.Tpo" ".deps/ufraw_exiv2.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/ufraw_exiv2.Tpo"; exit 1; fi ufraw_exiv2.cc: In function 'int ufraw_exif_from_exiv2(ufraw_data*)': ufraw_exiv2.cc:204: error: request for member 'c_str' in '((Exiv2::AnyError*)e)->Exiv2::AnyError::<anonymous>.std::exception::what()', which is of non-class type 'const char*'
Created attachment 153434 [details] initial patch, it at least compiles now. runtime only mimimally tested.
%changelog * Wed Apr 25 2007 Rex Dieter <rdieter[AT]fedoraproject> - 0.11-6 - initial exiv2 patch (#237846) comitted to cvs, I'll leave the building/testing to you. :)
Patch sent to ufraw-devel ml for review: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=462F9B60.1050100%40math.unl.edu
sync'd patch with what upstream has. Now I'm more confident, so I'll go ahead and queue the build...