Bug 2378690 (CVE-2025-6491) - CVE-2025-6491 php: NULL Pointer Dereference in PHP SOAP Extension via Large XML Namespace Prefix
Summary: CVE-2025-6491 php: NULL Pointer Dereference in PHP SOAP Extension via Large X...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2025-6491
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-07-08 17:34 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-01-27 17:55 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2025:23309 0 None None None 2025-12-18 12:20:25 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:1409 0 None None None 2026-01-27 17:55:27 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:1412 0 None None None 2026-01-27 17:29:59 UTC

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2025-07-08 17:34:38 UTC
If a SoapVar instance is created with a fully qualified name larger than 2G, this will cause a NULL pointer dereference resulting in a segmentation fault, leading to a denial of service.

Libxml versions prior to 2.13 cannot correctly handle a call to xmlNodeSetName() with a name longer than 2G. It will leave the node object in an invalid state with a NULL name. This later causes a NULL pointer dereference when using the name during message serialization.

This can be exploited if a SoapVar is created with a fully qualified name that is longer than 2G. This would be possible if some application code uses a namespace prefix from an untrusted source like from a remote SOAP service.

Comment 3 Ron Gould 2025-09-12 18:57:38 UTC
CVE state is currently "Fix Deferred". Is there a plan to fix this for Red Hat 8.10 for DNF Module php:8.2?

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2025-12-18 12:20:23 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2025:23309 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:23309

Comment 6 Ron Gould 2025-12-18 15:14:53 UTC
Will a fix be issued to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8?

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2026-01-27 17:29:58 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

Via RHSA-2026:1412 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1412

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2026-01-27 17:55:25 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:1409 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1409


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.