Bug 2383783 - Review Request: inkscape-silhouette - Plotter software
Summary: Review Request: inkscape-silhouette - Plotter software
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Luya Tshimbalanga
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/fablabnbg/inkscape...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-07-27 20:36 UTC by Benson Muite
Modified: 2025-12-07 01:25 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-12-07 00:55:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
luya_tfz: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9820235 to 9829843 (1.81 KB, patch)
2025-11-23 03:32 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Benson Muite 2025-07-27 20:36:37 UTC
spec: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/inkscape-silhouette.spec
srpm: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/inkscape-silhouette-1.29-1.fc42.src.rpm

description:
An application for controlling 2D plotters, cutters, engravers, and CNC
machines.

fas: fed500

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Luya Tshimbalanga 2025-08-03 23:47:23 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


Issues:
=======
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
  (~1MB) or number of files.
  Note: Documentation size is 1971568 bytes in 25 files.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_documentation


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version
     2", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "Creative Commons
     Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0", "*No copyright* GNU General Public
     License, Version 2". 124 files have unknown license. Detailed output
     of licensecheck in /home/luya/Documents/fedora-
     review/2383783-inkscape-silhouette/licensecheck.txt
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[?]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d
[?]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/udev(systemd-udev)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[?]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: inkscape-silhouette-1.29-1.fc43.noarch.rpm
          inkscape-silhouette-1.29-1.fc43.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpaywow16j')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

inkscape-silhouette.noarch: W: package-with-huge-docs 86%
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/udev/silhouette-udev-notify.sh 644 /bin/sh
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/inkscape/extensions/render_silhouette_regmarks.py
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/inkscape/extensions/silhouette/silhouette/convert2dashes.py
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/inkscape-silhouette/LICENSE
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/inkscape-silhouette/examples/testcut_sq_tr.py /bin/env python3
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 2 warnings, 14 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 0.3 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

inkscape-silhouette.noarch: W: package-with-huge-docs 86%
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/udev/silhouette-udev-notify.sh 644 /bin/sh
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/inkscape/extensions/render_silhouette_regmarks.py
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/inkscape/extensions/silhouette/silhouette/convert2dashes.py
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/inkscape-silhouette/LICENSE
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/inkscape-silhouette/examples/testcut_sq_tr.py /bin/env python3
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 2 warnings, 3 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 0.1 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/fablabnbg/inkscape-silhouette/archive/v1.29/inkscape-silhouette-1.29.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 2fbdf9c8fedff331a87eb4d774359094d9d8628e9b5b3de6a68f25287b532f35
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 2fbdf9c8fedff331a87eb4d774359094d9d8628e9b5b3de6a68f25287b532f35


Requires
--------
inkscape-silhouette (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python3
    inkscape
    python3dist(cssselect)
    python3dist(lxml)
    python3dist(matplotlib)
    python3dist(numpy)
    python3dist(pyusb)
    python3dist(tinycss2)
    python3dist(xmltodict)



Provides
--------
inkscape-silhouette:
    inkscape-silhouette


a) Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
  (~1MB) or number of files.
  Note: Documentation size is 1971568 bytes in 25 files.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_documentation

b) Rpmlint showed the following error messages:
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/udev/silhouette-udev-notify.sh 644 /bin/sh
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/inkscape/extensions/render_silhouette_regmarks.py
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/inkscape/extensions/silhouette/silhouette/convert2dashes.py
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/inkscape-silhouette/LICENSE
inkscape-silhouette.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/inkscape-silhouette/examples/testcut_sq_tr.py /bin/env python3

Please fix them.

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 15:47:21 UTC
Hello,
I do realize that this is possibly an old ticket. I am sorry that it hasn't been
reviewed yet. Let me trigger the Fedora Review Service to see if the package
builds successfully. Hopefully, a green check mark will attract some reviewer.

If I am resurrecting an old ticket that you are not interested in anymore, my
apologies, feel free to close it.

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 15:54:32 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9820235
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2383783-inkscape-silhouette/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09820235-inkscape-silhouette/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Documentation size is 1971568 bytes in 25 files. 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Luya Tshimbalanga 2025-11-22 02:28:43 UTC
See comment #1 for fix to do.

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-23 03:32:33 UTC
Created attachment 2115794 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9820235 to 9829843

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-23 03:32:35 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9829843
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2383783-inkscape-silhouette/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09829843-inkscape-silhouette/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 Luya Tshimbalanga 2025-11-23 03:46:41 UTC
Almost there.

python3.patch is unnecessary by replacing it by "sed -i "s|env python|env python3|g" beutil.py convert2dashes.py considering one line.



Skipping other lines from review.

[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version
     2", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "Creative Commons
     Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0", "*No copyright* GNU General Public
     License, Version 2". 124 files have unknown license. Detailed output
     of licensecheck in /home/luya/Documents/fedora-
     review/2383783-inkscape-silhouette/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.

Add "Creative Commons
     Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" and mention "sendto_silhouette.py" file.

Comment 9 Benson Muite 2025-11-24 18:26:58 UTC
The file is under either GPL-2.0 or Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0
https://github.com/fablabnbg/inkscape-silhouette/blob/main/sendto_silhouette.py#L5
Creative commons licenses are not allowed for code
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/

Patches are preferred to sed since if they cannot be applied to later versions,
the build will fail.  Can use sed if preferred though.

Comment 10 Luya Tshimbalanga 2025-11-26 00:43:28 UTC
Fair enough. After reviews, we can consider this package as APPROVED.

Comment 11 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-11-27 06:31:37 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/inkscape-silhouette

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2025-11-27 08:22:46 UTC
FEDORA-2025-526739eab5 (inkscape-silhouette-1.29-1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-526739eab5

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2025-11-27 08:23:44 UTC
FEDORA-2025-35ea524460 (inkscape-silhouette-1.29-1.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-35ea524460

Comment 14 Benson Muite 2025-11-27 17:25:49 UTC
Thanks for the review.

https://release-monitoring.org/project/387364/

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2025-11-29 17:31:11 UTC
FEDORA-2025-35ea524460 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-35ea524460 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-35ea524460

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2025-11-29 17:51:19 UTC
FEDORA-2025-526739eab5 has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-526739eab5 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-526739eab5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2025-12-07 00:55:44 UTC
FEDORA-2025-35ea524460 (inkscape-silhouette-1.29-1.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2025-12-07 01:25:59 UTC
FEDORA-2025-526739eab5 (inkscape-silhouette-1.29-1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.