Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 23887
Misdetection of MACH64 video RAM
Last modified: 2007-04-18 12:30:40 EDT
Anaconda misdetects the amount of memory present on my video card: 256KB
instead of 8MB.
[root@biwa stelian]# /sbin/lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo PRO133x]
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598/694x [Apollo
00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C596 ISA [Mobile South] (rev
00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. Bus Master IDE (rev 10)
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB (rev 11)
00:07.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C596 Power Management (rev
00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100]
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage LT Pro
AGP-133 (rev dc)
[root@biwa stelian]# /sbin/lspci -n
00:00.0 Class 0600: 1106:0691 (rev 44)
00:01.0 Class 0604: 1106:8598
00:07.0 Class 0601: 1106:0596 (rev 22)
00:07.1 Class 0101: 1106:0571 (rev 10)
00:07.2 Class 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 11)
00:07.3 Class 0600: 1106:3050 (rev 30)
00:0a.0 Class 0200: 8086:1229 (rev 08)
01:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:4c42 (rev dc)
Assigning to a developer.
Can you run ddcprobe and send me the output?
Will send you this tomorow morning (Europe TZ), it was a test machine at work,
don't have access to it right now.
Is this a laptop? I'm curious. I've seen this behavior on other Mach64's, but
they were laptops. My guess is that the memory that the card is returning is
understating what it should be. Usually, an 8 Meg card will return results like
128 x 64 for it's memory, which is 8192 kb, or 8 Megs. However, on some Mach
64's and also some ATI's, the card will report 127 x 64, which is 64k less than
we expected. I've already added code to check for this condition, so this issue
may already be resolved, but I need the output of ddcprobe to make sure.
Here it comes, the output of ddcprobe.
This is *not* a laptop.
You seem to be right, the card reports 127*64...
Created attachment 7788 [details]
Great! This issue has already been fixed. Resolving as rawhide.
firstname.lastname@example.org verified the fix ...