Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pajlada/chatterino2-fix/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09441824-chatterino2/chatterino2.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pajlada/chatterino2-fix/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09441824-chatterino2/chatterino2-2.5.2-1.fc44.src.rpm Description: The chatterino2 package was recently retired, so I'm looking to adopt it. COPR build succeeding: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pajlada/chatterino2-fix/build/9441824/ Pull Request I've made to the package containing the build fix: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chatterino2/pull-request/12 Fedora Account System Username: pajlada
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9441899 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2389308-chatterino2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09441899-chatterino2/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chatterino2 Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
hello @rasmus , im I aslo looking to adopt the package. would you like to co-own the package with me?
(In reply to solomoncyj from comment #2) > hello @rasmus , im I aslo looking to adopt the package. would you > like to co-own the package with me? I'd be happy to co-own the package :)
ok, I've created a seperate review request with a few changes here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2398039 do you mind closing yours? Thanks!
Closing in favour of @solomoncyj's review request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2398039 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2398039 ***
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days