Bug 2391494 - Please branch and build scalapack in epel10/10.1/10.0.
Summary: Please branch and build scalapack in epel10/10.1/10.0.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: scalapack
Version: epel10
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Orion Poplawski
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2391476
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-08-28 15:44 UTC by Orion Poplawski
Modified: 2025-10-11 01:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: scalapack-2.2.2-3.el10_2 scalapack-2.2.2-3.el10_1 scalapack-2.2.2-3.el10_0
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-10-11 00:23:39 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Orion Poplawski 2025-08-28 15:44:45 UTC
Please branch and build scalapack in epel10/10.1/10.0.

If you do not wish to maintain scalapack in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS orion);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/scalapack/adduser

It appears to build fine: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=136505597

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2025-10-01 13:29:55 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build scalapack in epel10?
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish
to build it on epel10 (FAS: orion).

Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2025-10-01 14:50:43 UTC
You have access now, I have a lot less time for EPEL these days.

Comment 3 Orion Poplawski 2025-10-02 02:20:56 UTC
Thanks!

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2025-10-02 03:50:12 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b2247b99c6 (scalapack-2.2.2-3.el10_0) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b2247b99c6

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-10-02 03:50:12 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-cf98601093 (scalapack-2.2.2-3.el10_2) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.2.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-cf98601093

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2025-10-02 03:50:12 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-60bb182214 (scalapack-2.2.2-3.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-60bb182214

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-10-03 02:01:40 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-60bb182214 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-60bb182214

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2025-10-03 02:07:59 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b2247b99c6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b2247b99c6

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2025-10-03 02:10:50 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-cf98601093 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-cf98601093

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2025-10-11 00:23:39 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-cf98601093 (scalapack-2.2.2-3.el10_2) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2025-10-11 01:35:51 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-60bb182214 (scalapack-2.2.2-3.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2025-10-11 01:44:35 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b2247b99c6 (scalapack-2.2.2-3.el10_0) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.