Bug 239279 - Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol
Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 398881
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 239280
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-05-07 07:58 EDT by Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:12 EST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-07 04:41:49 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal 2007-05-07 07:58:47 EDT
Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2.spec
SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2-0.15-0.20070506.1.fc7.src.rpm

Description:

libssh2 is a library implementing the SSH2 protocol as defined by
Internet Drafts: SECSH-TRANS(22), SECSH-USERAUTH(25),
SECSH-CONNECTION(23), SECSH-ARCH(20), SECSH-FILEXFER(06)*,
SECSH-DHGEX(04), and SECSH-NUMBERS(10).
Comment 1 Chris Weyl 2007-05-10 20:25:43 EDT
The man pages look to be more along the lines of developer documentation.  Would
they be better off in the -devel subpackage?
Comment 2 Chris Weyl 2007-05-23 14:39:47 EDT
Note needing to br pkgconfig directly is caused by a packaging bug in openssl. 
Filed at bug 241031.

There appears to be an "example" directory as well.  Would this make sense to
include as %doc in -devel?
Comment 3 Chris Weyl 2007-05-23 17:45:33 EDT
Heh.  I'm apparently doing this piecemeal.

Release is also off, it should be:
   0.1.%{checkoutdate}%{?dist}
not
   0.%{checkoutdate}.1%{?dist}
Comment 4 Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal 2007-05-23 19:04:17 EDT
Updated 

- Fix release tag
- Move manpages to -devel package
- Add Examples dir to -devel package


SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2.spec
SRPM:
http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2-0.15-0.2.20070506.fc7.src.rpm
Comment 5 Ruben Kerkhof 2007-06-17 04:15:26 EDT
I haven't been able to download Source0 from http://dl.sourceforge.net/libssh2/%{name}-%{version}-%
{checkoutdate}.tar.gz

The latest version there seems to be 0.14.
Comment 6 Xavier Lamien 2007-07-07 23:44:37 EDT
ping ?
Comment 7 Matthias Saou 2007-08-31 13:34:04 EDT
Well, at that time, 0.15 wasn't out and the "%define checkoutdate 20070506" from
the spec sort of shows it. But now 0.17 is out. Please update the package, then
I'd be more than willing to perform a review.
Comment 9 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-09-27 11:26:04 EDT
Is there any update or should I go with comment #4 package for review?
Comment 10 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-28 09:36:09 EDT
IMO this review must be closed if no response from the reporter is
received within ONE WEEK.
There are some other packages submitted by Sindre with no response
for a long time.

I will also want to close bugs which are blocked by this bug
if no response is gained within ONE WEEK.
Comment 11 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-10-07 04:41:49 EDT
CLOSING.

If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please
open a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate
of the new request.

Thank you!
Comment 12 Chris Weyl 2007-10-15 22:44:54 EDT
Unfortunately, I don't have time to submit/maintain libssh2 properly at the
moment... but I do have an updated spec/package for libssh2 out at:

http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/libssh2-0.17-1.fc7.src.rpm
http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/libssh2.spec
Comment 13 Chris Weyl 2007-11-25 18:25:27 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 398881 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.