Bug 2397836 - Review Request: texlive-scheme-tetex - teTeX scheme (more than medium, but nowhere near full)
Summary: Review Request: texlive-scheme-tetex - teTeX scheme (more than medium, but no...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Suchý
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://tug.org/texlive/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-09-24 15:16 UTC by Tom "spot" Callaway
Modified: 2026-02-07 13:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-02-07 13:33:16 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
msuchy: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tom "spot" Callaway 2025-09-24 15:16:34 UTC
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-scheme-tetex.spec
SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-scheme-tetex-svn74022-1.fc44.src.rpm
Description:
teTeX scheme (more than medium, but nowhere near full) TeX Live scheme nearly
equivalent to the teTeX distribution that was maintained by Thomas Esser.
Fedora Account System Username: spot

This package is part of an effort to modularize and more completely package TeXLive in Fedora, starting with TL2025. A copr with F43 and Rawhide builds for this package (and the rest of the package set) can be found here:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/texlive-2025/

The use of a high epoch is intentional, this is the legacy of TeXLive, and it ensures consistency in dependencies and forcing upgrades.

All of the "scheme" packages are metapackages. TeXLive uses "schemes" to recommend specific sets of "collections" to be installed, and "collections" are made up of specific TeX components. Accordingly, all "scheme" packages have no sources, build nothing, and install nothing. They are separated out because TeXLive can change what goes into a "scheme" and/or rename a "collection".

Bonus: This should be a really easy review.

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-09-24 15:24:21 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9597781
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2397836-texlive-scheme-tetex/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09597781-texlive-scheme-tetex/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2025-09-24 21:01:35 UTC
This is easy. APPROVED.

Technically speaking, this BZ should depend on the other BZ you have currently on review. But I would consider it redundant bureaucracy as I am sure you will take care to put all these packages in Fedora in the correct order.

As you are redoing all the texlive packages, I would consider the usage of %autorelease or at least %autochangelog. But that is a choice of preference and not a review blocker.

Comment 3 Tom "spot" Callaway 2026-01-05 20:56:30 UTC
Please reset and re-enable the review flag here, so I can start making these packages in rawhide. Apologies for the extra work, I didn't realize there was a time-limit.

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2026-01-06 09:12:20 UTC
What time limit? It has flag fedora-review+ that should be enough.
I will try to flip it on this BZ if this makes difference, but please try again on the others.

Comment 5 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-01-06 15:25:55 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/texlive-scheme-tetex

Comment 6 Tom "spot" Callaway 2026-01-06 15:26:52 UTC
This worked, thanks. The others still need the same treatment:

spot@triceratops:~/git$ fedpkg request-repo texlive-acrotex 2397821
Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over 60 days ago


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.