Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use Jira Cloud for all bug tracking management.

Bug 2400114

Summary:	[cee/sd][RGW-multisite] after manual bucket index reshard old bucket index objects are still present
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Tomas Petr <tpetr>
Component:	RGW-Multisite	Assignee:	shilpa <smanjara>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Tejas <tchandra>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Rivka Pollack <rpollack>
Priority:	high
Version:	6.1	CC:	ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, cylopez, jcaratza, mbenjamin, mkasturi, rpollack, smanjara, tchandra
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	9.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-20.1.0-14	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	.Cleanup added for index segments of replicated buckets Previously, dynamic resharding with multi-site replication had a long-standing limitation: old index segments were not cleaned up due to simultaneous access to old and new index shards during replication. This resulted in persistent space leakage. With this enhancement, cleanup for index segments of replicated buckets has been added. As a result, the space leakage issue is resolved, improving storage efficiency and overall system health.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2026-01-29 07:00:25 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2388233

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2026-01-29 07:00:25 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 9.0 Security and Enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1536