Bug 2400592 (CVE-2025-39910) - CVE-2025-39910 kernel: mm/vmalloc, mm/kasan: respect gfp mask in kasan_populate_vmalloc()
Summary: CVE-2025-39910 kernel: mm/vmalloc, mm/kasan: respect gfp mask in kasan_popula...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2025-39910
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-10-01 08:01 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2025-10-02 10:25 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2025-10-01 08:01:16 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/vmalloc, mm/kasan: respect gfp mask in kasan_populate_vmalloc()

kasan_populate_vmalloc() and its helpers ignore the caller's gfp_mask and
always allocate memory using the hardcoded GFP_KERNEL flag.  This makes
them inconsistent with vmalloc(), which was recently extended to support
GFP_NOFS and GFP_NOIO allocations.

Page table allocations performed during shadow population also ignore the
external gfp_mask.  To preserve the intended semantics of GFP_NOFS and
GFP_NOIO, wrap the apply_to_page_range() calls into the appropriate
memalloc scope.

xfs calls vmalloc with GFP_NOFS, so this bug could lead to deadlock.

There was a report here
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/686ea951.050a0220.385921.0016.GAE@google.com

This patch:
 - Extends kasan_populate_vmalloc() and helpers to take gfp_mask;
 - Passes gfp_mask down to alloc_pages_bulk() and __get_free_page();
 - Enforces GFP_NOFS/NOIO semantics with memalloc_*_save()/restore()
   around apply_to_page_range();
 - Updates vmalloc.c and percpu allocator call sites accordingly.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.