Bug 2401566 (CVE-2023-53599) - CVE-2023-53599 kernel: crypto: af_alg - Fix missing initialisation affecting gcm-aes-s390
Summary: CVE-2023-53599 kernel: crypto: af_alg - Fix missing initialisation affecting ...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2023-53599
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-10-04 16:07 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2025-11-26 12:13 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2025-10-04 16:07:47 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

crypto: af_alg - Fix missing initialisation affecting gcm-aes-s390

Fix af_alg_alloc_areq() to initialise areq->first_rsgl.sgl.sgt.sgl to point
to the scatterlist array in areq->first_rsgl.sgl.sgl.

Without this, the gcm-aes-s390 driver will oops when it tries to do
gcm_walk_start() on req->dst because req->dst is set to the value of
areq->first_rsgl.sgl.sgl by _aead_recvmsg() calling
aead_request_set_crypt().

The problem comes if an empty ciphertext is passed: the loop in
af_alg_get_rsgl() just passes straight out and doesn't set areq->first_rsgl
up.

This isn't a problem on x86_64 using gcmaes_crypt_by_sg() because, as far
as I can tell, that ignores req->dst and only uses req->src[*].

[*] Is this a bug in aesni-intel_glue.c?

The s390x oops looks something like:

 Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space
 Failing address: 0000000a00000000 TEID: 0000000a00000803
 Fault in home space mode while using kernel ASCE.
 AS:00000000a43a0007 R3:0000000000000024
 Oops: 003b ilc:2 [#1] SMP
 ...
 Call Trace:
  [<000003ff7fc3d47e>] gcm_walk_start+0x16/0x28 [aes_s390]
  [<00000000a2a342f2>] crypto_aead_decrypt+0x9a/0xb8
  [<00000000a2a60888>] aead_recvmsg+0x478/0x698
  [<00000000a2e519a0>] sock_recvmsg+0x70/0xb0
  [<00000000a2e51a56>] sock_read_iter+0x76/0xa0
  [<00000000a273e066>] vfs_read+0x26e/0x2a8
  [<00000000a273e8c4>] ksys_read+0xbc/0x100
  [<00000000a311d808>] __do_syscall+0x1d0/0x1f8
  [<00000000a312ff30>] system_call+0x70/0x98
 Last Breaking-Event-Address:
  [<000003ff7fc3e6b4>] gcm_aes_crypt+0x104/0xa68 [aes_s390]


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.