Bug 240509 - fence_bladecenter needs longer timeout
fence_bladecenter needs longer timeout
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: cman (Show other bugs)
5.0
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jim Parsons
: Patch
Depends On: 190455
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-05-17 20:45 EDT by Matt Brodeur
Modified: 2010-10-22 11:08 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 16:51:21 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch to increase the timeout (519 bytes, patch)
2008-04-27 02:28 EDT, David Robinson
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Matt Brodeur 2007-05-17 20:45:53 EDT
This bug still exists/reappeared in RHEL5, cman-2.0.60-1.el5.


+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #190455 +++

Description of problem:
When using fence_bladecenter to powercycle an LS20 I find that it fails most of
the time.  I pushed the sleep 5 out to sleep 10 and it hasn't failed again yet.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fence-1.32.18-0

How reproducible:
sparadic (sp?)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. try to -o reboot ibm-morrison.lab.boston.redhat.com

-- Additional comment from jparsons@redhat.com on 2006-05-15 13:22 EST --
changed in U4 release
Comment 1 David Robinson 2008-04-27 02:28:47 EDT
Created attachment 303892 [details]
patch to increase the timeout

We've had a customer encounter this too. Attached is a patch that fixed the
problem for them.
Comment 4 Alan Twohill 2008-07-21 21:39:15 EDT
Confirmed still in RHEL5.2.
Fixed by adding 

sleep 5;

In between power commands and power status checks in the file
/sbin/fence_bladecenter
Comment 5 Jim Parsons 2008-07-30 09:57:25 EDT
Done
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 16:51:21 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0189.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.