Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 2405377

Summary:	rgw-multisite: object deletion is not properly synced on versioning-suspended bucket
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	shilpa <smanjara>
Component:	RGW-Multisite	Assignee:	Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Chaithra <ckulal>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:	Rivka Pollack <rpollack>
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	9.0	CC:	ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, ckulal, mkasturi, rpollack, vimishra
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	mkasturi: needinfo+
Target Release:	9.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-20.1.0-63	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2026-01-29 07:02:19 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description shilpa 2025-10-21 16:15:27 UTC

Description of problem:

when an object is deleted, the real object is deleted, and replaced by a delete-marker with empty instance-id. However on the secondary zone, once the replication finishes, we can see the real object is still there, and a delete-marker with non-empty instance-id is created on top of it.



How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
details in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73540

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2026-01-29 07:02:19 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 9.0 Security and Enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1536