Bug 2405772 (CVE-2023-53703) - CVE-2023-53703 kernel: HID: amd_sfh: Fix for shift-out-of-bounds
Summary: CVE-2023-53703 kernel: HID: amd_sfh: Fix for shift-out-of-bounds
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2023-53703
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-10-22 14:06 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2025-10-22 16:14 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2025-10-22 14:06:07 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

HID: amd_sfh: Fix for shift-out-of-bounds

Shift operation of 'exp' and 'shift' variables exceeds the maximum number
of shift values in the u32 range leading to UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds.

...
[    6.120512] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c:149:50
[    6.120598] shift exponent 104 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
[    6.120659] CPU: 4 PID: 96 Comm: kworker/4:1 Not tainted 6.4.0amd_1-next-20230519-dirty #10
[    6.120665] Hardware name: AMD Birman-PHX/Birman-PHX, BIOS SFH_with_HPD_SEN.FD 04/05/2023
[    6.120667] Workqueue: events amd_sfh_work_buffer [amd_sfh]
[    6.120687] Call Trace:
[    6.120690]  <TASK>
[    6.120694]  dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x70
[    6.120704]  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[    6.120707]  ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40
[    6.120716]  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x10f/0x170
[    6.120720]  ? psi_group_change+0x25f/0x4b0
[    6.120729]  float_to_int.cold+0x18/0xba [amd_sfh]
[    6.120739]  get_input_rep+0x57/0x340 [amd_sfh]
[    6.120748]  ? __schedule+0xba7/0x1b60
[    6.120756]  ? __pfx_get_input_rep+0x10/0x10 [amd_sfh]
[    6.120764]  amd_sfh_work_buffer+0x91/0x180 [amd_sfh]
[    6.120772]  process_one_work+0x229/0x430
[    6.120780]  worker_thread+0x4a/0x3c0
[    6.120784]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[    6.120788]  kthread+0xf7/0x130
[    6.120792]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[    6.120795]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
[    6.120804]  </TASK>
...

Fix this by adding the condition to validate shift ranges.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.