Bug 2408803 - Review Request: dlib - Dlib is a modern C++ toolkit containing machine learning algorithms and tools for creating complex software in C++ to solve real world problems.
Summary: Review Request: dlib - Dlib is a modern C++ toolkit containing machine learni...
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Benson Muite
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-10-31 09:57 UTC by Shek Yun Kwan
Modified: 2025-12-29 14:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
benson_muite: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9762673 to 9957586 (2.32 KB, patch)
2025-12-29 14:20 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Shek Yun Kwan 2025-10-31 09:57:27 UTC
Spec URL: https://github.com/ykshek/dlib-copr-specs/raw/refs/heads/main/dlib.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/ykshek/dlib-copr-specs/raw/refs/heads/main/dlib-20.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: Dlib is a modern C++ toolkit containing machine learning algorithms and tools for creating complex software in C++ to solve real world problems. See http://dlib.net for the main project documentation and API reference.
Fedora Account System Username: starfish
A build is done in the COPR https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/starfish/howdy-beta/package/dlib/

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-10-31 09:57:43 UTC
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are:

- You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description
  or any of your comments
- The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS
- The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified
  in the ticket summary


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2025-10-31 10:13:48 UTC
Note that this packages was previously included in Fedora but was retired due to lack of maintenance (failed to build):

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dlib

Comment 3 Shek Yun Kwan 2025-11-03 04:24:03 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-04 05:03:29 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9762673
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2408803-dlib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09762673-dlib/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/dnn_instance_segmentation_ex.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/dnn_semantic_segmentation_ex.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/pascal_voc_2012.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/resnet.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/slm_data.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/slm_defs.h 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages
- License file license.xml is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dlib
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Benson Muite 2025-12-28 05:36:13 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-
  doc/examples/dnn_instance_segmentation_ex.h dlib-doc :
  /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/dnn_semantic_segmentation_ex.h dlib-doc
  : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/pascal_voc_2012.h dlib-doc :
  /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/resnet.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-
  doc/examples/slm_data.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-
  doc/examples/slm_defs.h
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_devel_packages
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file license.xml is not marked as %license
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
  Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dlib
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Boost Software License
     1.0", "*No copyright* Boost Software License and/or Public domain",
     "*No copyright* Boost Software License", "Boost Software License",
     "Boost Software License 1.0", "BSD 3-Clause License", "Boost Software
     License and/or Public domain", "Boost Software License and/or NTP
     License", "NTP License", "libpng License", "zlib License". 930 files
     have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/dlib/2408803-dlib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/python3.14/site-
     packages, /usr/lib64/python3.14
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 3384 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     python3-dlib
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
     attached diff).
     See: (this test has no URL)
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: dlib-20.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm
          dlib-devel-20.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm
          python3-dlib-20.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm
          dlib-doc-20.0-1.fc44.noarch.rpm
          dlib-20.0-1.fc44.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpqezyesaq')]
checks: 32, packages: 5

dlib.x86_64: W: no-documentation
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
dlib-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/johns/John_Shimkus/000378_03227610.jpg /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/johns/John_Shimkus/000378_02340151.jpg
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/cassert /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/iomanip /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/iosfwd /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/iostream /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/locale /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 29 warnings, 26 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 5.5 s 




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: dlib-debuginfo-20.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpdrx_frmt')]
checks: 32, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 1.1 s 





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 5

dlib-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
dlib.x86_64: W: no-documentation
dlib-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/johns/John_Shimkus/000378_03227610.jpg /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/johns/John_Shimkus/000378_02340151.jpg
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/cassert /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/iomanip /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/iosfwd /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/iostream /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/string/locale /usr/include/dlib/bits/c++config.h
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/examples/examples_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/gui/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/convert_dlib_nets_to_caffe_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
dlib-devel.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/imglab_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake /usr/include/dlib/test/redhat-linux-build/tools/htmlify_build/dlib_build/CMakeFiles/CMakeDirectoryInformation.cmake
 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 29 warnings, 28 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 3.3 s 



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
python3-dlib: /usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/_dlib_pybind11.cpython-314-x86_64-linux-gnu.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/davisking/dlib/archive/v20.0/dlib-20.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 705749801c7896f5c19c253b6be639f4cef2c1831a9606955f01b600b3d86d80
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 705749801c7896f5c19c253b6be639f4cef2c1831a9606955f01b600b3d86d80


Requires
--------
dlib (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libX11.so.6()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libflexiblas.so.3()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)(64bit)
    libjpeg.so.62()(64bit)
    libjpeg.so.62(LIBJPEGTURBO_6.2)(64bit)
    libjpeg.so.62(LIBJPEG_6.2)(64bit)
    libjxl.so.0.11()(64bit)
    libjxl.so.0.11(JXL_0)(64bit)
    libjxl_threads.so.0.11()(64bit)
    libjxl_threads.so.0.11(JXL_0)(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpng16.so.16()(64bit)
    libpng16.so.16(PNG16_0)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.13)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.15)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.3)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
    libwebp.so.7()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

dlib-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    cmake-filesystem(x86-64)
    dlib(x86-64)
    libdlib.so.20.0.0()(64bit)

python3-dlib (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libX11.so.6()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libflexiblas.so.3()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)(64bit)
    libjpeg.so.62()(64bit)
    libjpeg.so.62(LIBJPEG_6.2)(64bit)
    libjxl.so.0.11()(64bit)
    libjxl.so.0.11(JXL_0)(64bit)
    libjxl_threads.so.0.11()(64bit)
    libjxl_threads.so.0.11(JXL_0)(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpng16.so.16()(64bit)
    libpng16.so.16(PNG16_0)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.11)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.13)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.15)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.2)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.3)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
    libwebp.so.7()(64bit)
    python(abi)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

dlib-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    dlib



Provides
--------
dlib:
    dlib
    dlib(x86-64)
    libdlib.so.20.0.0()(64bit)

dlib-devel:
    cmake(dlib)
    dlib-devel
    dlib-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(dlib-1)

python3-dlib:
    python-dlib
    python3-dlib
    python3-dlib(x86-64)
    python3.14-dlib
    python3.14dist(dlib)
    python3dist(dlib)

dlib-doc:
    dlib-doc



Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
--- /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/dlib/2408803-dlib/srpm/dlib.spec	2025-11-07 15:29:23.735240462 +0300
+++ /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/dlib/2408803-dlib/srpm-unpacked/dlib.spec	2025-10-31 03:00:00.000000000 +0300
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
 URL:        http://dlib.net
 Source:     %forgesource
+# Fix build issue with GCC 15
+Patch1:      https://github.com/davisking/dlib/pull/3067.patch
 # Fix build issue with Python 3.14
-Patch:      https://github.com/davisking/dlib/pull/3098.patch
+Patch2:      https://github.com/davisking/dlib/pull/3098.patch
 
 BuildRequires:  boost-devel
@@ -92,5 +94,11 @@
 
 %prep
-%forgeautosetup -p1
+%forgeautosetup -N
+# Add patches
+%if 0%{?fedora} < 43
+%autopatch 1 -vp1
+%else
+%autopatch 2 -vp1
+%endif
 
 find docs -type f -exec chmod 644 {} +
@@ -116,4 +124,5 @@
 
 
+
 %build
 # dlib requires `libjxl_cms` provided by libjxl >= 0.10` currently only


Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2408803
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, C/C++, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Perl, R, Haskell, fonts, Ocaml, PHP, SugarActivity, Java
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comments:
a) Please list additional license from:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2408803-dlib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09762673-dlib/fedora-review/licensecheck.txt
if bundled and used in the final output.  If none of Kiss_fft, libjpeg, libpng, zlib are used in the build, can
they be removed in the prep stage? If they are used, could what is packaged in Fedora be used instead?
b) Please use Pybind11 from Fedora repositories
c) Please remove external/cblas in prep stage to ensure it is not accidentally used in the build
d) Please add:
Requires: python3-libs
to the Python package to ensure all directories are owned
e) Can the Python GUI be built?
f) Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=140447946
g) Can you file a bug report upstream about test failures on s390x - it should be possible to do a build on copr
h) The Python build seems to rebuild the entire dlib library rather than linking to the already built shared library.
Is it possible to just make the bindings and link to the already built shared library?

Comment 6 Shek Yun Kwan 2025-12-29 13:22:08 UTC
Hi, thank you for the package review! Regarding the comments:

e) There is a test for the GUI during the build, so I guess it can be assumed to be built if it passes? It does seem to pass, at least on non s390x.

g) The s390x issue used to be tracked here(https://github.com/davisking/dlib/issues/2947) and the fix is merged. It seems that the previous maintainer decided to just disable s390x and probably never got around to fixing it, and upstream seems to be saying they are unable to debug it? Unfortunately I don't really know how to fix it, and I doubt upstream wants to do that given the project owner says "But I don't know if anyone is using it on s390x. Maybe the tests are just overly tight numerically?" (https://github.com/davisking/dlib/issues/2947#issuecomment-2081475292).

h) I don't know how to do this. I assume this isn't something I can just add to the spec file?

The rest of the corrections are done in the updated spec file and srpm here:
Spec URL: https://github.com/ykshek/dlib-copr-specs/raw/refs/heads/fedora-review/dlib.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/ykshek/dlib-copr-specs/raw/refs/heads/fedora-review/dlib-20.0-1.fc43.src.rpm

A test build is done here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/starfish/dlib/build/9957347/

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2025-12-29 14:20:14 UTC
Created attachment 2120395 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9762673 to 9957586

Comment 8 Fedora Review Service 2025-12-29 14:20:16 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9957586
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2408803-dlib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09957586-dlib/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/dnn_instance_segmentation_ex.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/dnn_semantic_segmentation_ex.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/pascal_voc_2012.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/resnet.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/slm_data.h dlib-doc : /usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/examples/slm_defs.h 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages
- License file license.xml is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Not a valid SPDX expression 'BSL-1.0 AND Zlib AND libpng AND NTP'.
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1
- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dlib
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.