Bug 2415829 - Review Request: mod_authz_sss - Authorize Apache access using SSSD
Summary: Review Request: mod_authz_sss - Authorize Apache access using SSSD
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/ondrejv2/mod_authz...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-11-19 10:02 UTC by Ondrej
Modified: 2025-11-20 08:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9815820 to 9815874 (715 bytes, patch)
2025-11-20 08:33 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-19 16:37:52 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9811942
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2415829-mod_authz_sss/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09811942-mod_authz_sss/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
- License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Not a valid SPDX expression 'ASL 2.0'. It seems that you are using the old Fedora license abbreviations. Try `license-fedora2spdx' for converting it to SPDX.
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 07:47:40 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9815820
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2415829-mod_authz_sss/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09815820-mod_authz_sss/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
- License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Not a valid SPDX expression 'ASL 2.0'. It seems that you are using the old Fedora license abbreviations. Try `license-fedora2spdx' for converting it to SPDX.
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 08:33:29 UTC
Created attachment 2115365 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9815820 to 9815874

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 08:33:32 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9815874
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2415829-mod_authz_sss/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09815874-mod_authz_sss/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.