In Fedora 43 (and also other versions), the SPEC file for the zstd package currently states:

> License: BSD-3-Clause AND GPL-2.0-only

However, the official zstd repository (README.md and license headers) for version v1.5.7 includes the following statement:

> This repository represents the reference implementation, provided as an open-source dual BSD OR GPLv2 licensed C library, and a command line utility producing and decoding .zst, .gz, .xz and .lz4 files.

https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/v1.5.7/README.md

> This source code is licensed under both the BSD-style license (found in the   
> LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree) and the GPLv2 (found   
> in the COPYING file in the root directory of this source tree).   
> You may select, at your option, one of the above-listed licenses.

https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/v1.5.7/lib/compress/zstd_compress.c

This indicates that zstd is dual-licensed under BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0-only, not AND.


* Is there an intentional reason Fedora uses BSD-3-Clause AND GPL-2.0-only for this package?
* If this is not intentional, should the tag be corrected to BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0-only?

Reproducible: Always