Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09837701-evtgen/evtgen.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09837701-evtgen/evtgen-3.00.00b1-1.fc44.src.rpm Description: EvtGen is a Monte Carlo event generator that simulates the decays of heavy flavor particles, primarily B and D mesons. It contains a range of decay models for intermediate and final states containing scalar, vector and tensor mesons or resonances, as well as leptons, photons and baryons. Decay amplitudes are used to generate each branch of a given full decay tree, taking into account angular and time-dependent correlations which allows for the simulation of CP-violating processes. Fedora Account System Username: yanqiyu copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/yanqiyu/evtgen/build/9837701/ fedora-review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09837701-evtgen/fedora-review/review.txt
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9837663 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2417094-evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09837663-evtgen/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - Check did not completechecksum differs and there are problems running diff. Please verify manually. Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/EvtGen [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Bad spec filename: /export/home/trosten/fedora/review/2417094-evtgen/srpm- unpacked/evtgen.spec See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: evtgen-3.00.00b1-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm evtgen-devel-3.00.00b1-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm evtgen-data-3.00.00b1-1.fc44.noarch.rpm evtgen-doc-3.00.00b1-1.fc44.noarch.rpm evtgen-3.00.00b1-1.fc44.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpbyorplvk')] checks: 32, packages: 5 evtgen.x86_64: W: no-documentation evtgen-data.noarch: W: no-documentation evtgen-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation evtgen.spec: W: no-%check-section 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings, 31 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 1.8 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: evtgen-debuginfo-3.00.00b1-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpdqy3kzlc')] checks: 32, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 12 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.8 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 5 evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZTI18EvtDecayIncoherent (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN18EvtDecayIncoherent9makeDecayEP11EvtParticleb (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN12EvtDecayBase11commandNameB5cxx11Ev (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN12EvtDecayBase7commandENSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN12EvtDecayBase12getParamNameB5cxx11Ei (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN12EvtDecayBase15getParamDefaultB5cxx11Ei (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZNK12EvtDecayBase13matchingDecayERKS_ (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZTV12EvtDecayBase (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL8getWidthE5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _Z12EvtGenReport14EvtGenSeverityPKc (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN13EvtDecayTable11getInstanceEv (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN11EvtVector4RC1Edddd (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL9getStdHepE5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN9EvtRandom4FlatEv (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL4chg3E5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN11EvtParticle15deleteDaughtersEb (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN12EvtDecayBase9noProbMaxEv (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZNK11EvtVector4R5d3magEv (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN11EvtParticle13makeDaughtersEmSt6vectorI5EvtIdSaIS1_EE (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbo l/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN11EvtParticle34setSpinDensityForwardHelicityBasisERK14EvtSpinDensityddd (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN14EvtSpinDensityD1Ev (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZNK11EvtParticle4massEv (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN11EvtSpinType8getSpin2ENS_8spintypeE (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL11getSpinTypeE5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL7entriesEv (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZNK13EvtDecayTable9hasPythiaEi (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZNK11EvtParticle5getIdEv (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN14EvtSpinDensityC1Ev (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL5getIdERKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN13EvtDecayTable14findDecayModelEii (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL11getMeanMassE5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN28EvtExtGeneratorCommandsTable11getInstanceEv (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN14EvtSpinDensity6setDimEi (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN14EvtSpinDensity3setEiiRK10EvtComplex (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZNK11EvtParticle8getNDaugEv (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL10chargeConjE5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL10getMinMassE5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZNK11EvtParticle5getP4Ev (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL10getMaxMassE5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL15evtIdFromStdHepEi (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL7getctauE5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL8getEntryEi (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN6EvtPDL4nameB5cxx11E5EvtId (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZNK13EvtDecayTable9getNModesEi (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 _ZN12EvtDecayBase6getArgEj (/usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0) evtgen-data.noarch: W: no-documentation evtgen-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation evtgen.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 45 errors, 3 warnings, 41 filtered, 45 badness; has taken 1.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://evtgen.hepforge.org/downloads?f=EvtGen-03.00.00-beta1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : ERROR CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 59dbf2f4f91dbd59072e3e2ef53ce60cdbc6a5021f0df3001c43d6350716167d Requires -------- evtgen (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): evtgen-data glibc libHepMC3.so.4()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpythia8-8.3.15.so()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.7)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) evtgen-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): evtgen(x86-64) libEvtGen.so.2()(64bit) libEvtGenExternal.so.2()(64bit) evtgen-data (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): evtgen(x86-64) evtgen-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): evtgen(x86-64) Provides -------- evtgen: evtgen evtgen(x86-64) libEvtGen.so.2()(64bit) libEvtGenExternal.so.2()(64bit) evtgen-devel: evtgen-devel evtgen-devel(x86-64) evtgen-data: evtgen-data evtgen-doc: evtgen-doc Summary: -------- - unowned dir: add %dir on /usr/share/EvtGen (only subdir /usr/share/EvtGen/cmake is owned now) - the ? in sourceurl confuses various tooling, the correct checksum is: $ sha256sum EvtGen-03.00.00-beta1.tar.gz 59dbf2f4f91dbd59072e3e2ef53ce60cdbc6a5021f0df3001c43d6350716167d EvtGen-03.00.00-beta1.tar.gz Add comment about that in spec file? - there are various tests/validation available, can you try to add %check with some of that? - can you comment on the undefined-non-weak-symbol in /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 Where are those symbols? In Base?
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09844087-evtgen/evtgen.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09844087-evtgen/evtgen-3.00.00b1-2.fc44.src.rpm Thank you so much for your review, I updated the spec file accordingly. For your remarks: - unowned dir: add %dir on /usr/share/EvtGen (only subdir /usr/share/EvtGen/cmake is owned now) Done, now the dir should belong to -data sub-package - the ? in sourceurl confuses various tooling, the correct checksum is: $ sha256sum EvtGen-03.00.00-beta1.tar.gz 59dbf2f4f91dbd59072e3e2ef53ce60cdbc6a5021f0df3001c43d6350716167d EvtGen-03.00.00-beta1.tar.gz Add comment about that in spec file? Upstream uses this kind of link so we can't do much about it. But yes, comment updated - there are various tests/validation available, can you try to add %check with some of that? It seems that enabling test don't give me any executables. And the validation seems to be for internal usage, some lack required input (like testCPVDecays), some are just for plotting and only genExampleRootFiles seems to run, but there is still no documentation of how to validate the ROOT file it generates. - can you comment on the undefined-non-weak-symbol in /usr/lib64/libEvtGenExternal.so.2.2.0 Where are those symbols? In Base? It is defined in libEvtGen.so.xxx, changed the cmake file to link libEvtGenExternal against libEvtGen which should solve those problem. ====== And changed the spec file that the changes to the source is done via a patch file.
Just realized the warning about unowned %{_datadir}/EvtGen should be subject to -devel package only, will add `%dir %{_datadir}/EvtGen` to -devel and see what happens (or we can ignore this since -devel pulls in main package which in turn pulls in -data, making /usr/share/EvtGen always be owned by -data, which is the case from the begining?)
Created attachment 2116496 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 9837663 to 9847004
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9847004 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2417094-evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09847004-evtgen/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - Check did not completechecksum differs and there are problems running diff. Please verify manually. Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Yes, please check this version instead, the -devel package now explicitly depends on -data, I think this is the suggested way as per guideline. Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09847054-evtgen/evtgen.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09847054-evtgen/evtgen-3.00.00b1-2.fc44.src.rpm
Created attachment 2116498 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 9847004 to 9847093
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9847093 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2417094-evtgen/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09847093-evtgen/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - Check did not completechecksum differs and there are problems running diff. Please verify manually. Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Thanks for update, looks fine now. package is APPROVED
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/evtgen
FEDORA-2025-5c62de082f (evtgen-3.00.00b1-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-5c62de082f