Bug 2417767 - Review Request: perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find - Detect bonds in a molecule from atomic 3D coords and assign formal bond orders
Summary: Review Request: perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find - Detect bonds in a molecule from at...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Terje Rosten
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Chemistry-B...
Whiteboard: Trivial
Depends On: 2417375
Blocks: 2417812 2418269 2418271 2418592
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-11-28 21:31 UTC by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Modified: 2025-12-05 17:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-12-05 17:07:13 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
terjeros: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2025-11-28 21:31:57 UTC
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find/perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find.spec
SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find/perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find-0.23-1.fc44.src.rpm
Description:
This module provides functions for detecting the bonds in a molecule from its
3D coordinates by using simple cutoffs, and for guessing the formal bond
orders.

Fedora Account System Username: rathann

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-28 21:34:10 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9847798
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2417767-perl-chemistry-bond-find/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09847798-perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Terje Rosten 2025-12-04 16:01:51 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Chemistry(perl-Chemistry-Mol)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 877 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find-0.23-1.fc44.noarch.rpm
          perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find-0.23-1.fc44.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmplmb4bkyl')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find.noarch: E: spelling-error ('coords', 'Summary(en_US) coords -> cords, Coors, coeds')
perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find.src: E: spelling-error ('coords', 'Summary(en_US) coords -> cords, Coors, coeds')
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings, 7 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.2 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find.noarch: E: spelling-error ('coords', 'Summary(en_US) coords -> curds, cords, chords')
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings, 3 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/I/IT/ITUB/Chemistry-Bond-Find-0.23.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 07ee896bf91cbe94f46dca0bb0d222c0989432a6c8255691bafadcf4cbb3fae6
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 07ee896bf91cbe94f46dca0bb0d222c0989432a6c8255691bafadcf4cbb3fae6


Requires
--------
perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    perl(Carp)
    perl(Chemistry::Mol)
    perl(Exporter)
    perl(POSIX)
    perl(strict)
    perl-libs

Provides
--------
perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find:
    perl(Chemistry::Bond::Find)
    perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find


 Summary:
----------
 - all good,

   package is APPROVED

Comment 3 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-12-05 16:56:03 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2025-12-05 17:04:00 UTC
FEDORA-2025-bb1a316c9b (perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find-0.23-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-bb1a316c9b

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-12-05 17:07:13 UTC
FEDORA-2025-bb1a316c9b (perl-Chemistry-Bond-Find-0.23-1.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.