Bug 2418957 - [Lenovo] faad2-libs licence files missing from filesystem
Summary: [Lenovo] faad2-libs licence files missing from filesystem
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: faad2
Version: 43
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-12-04 21:44 UTC by Mark Pearson
Modified: 2025-12-09 00:54 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: faad2-2.11.2-5.fc44 faad2-2.11.2-5.fc43
Clone Of: 2418955
: 2418958 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-12-06 09:41:23 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mark Pearson 2025-12-04 21:44:40 UTC
Doing open source compliance review for Lenovo's Fedora 43 WS preload and found that faad2-libs package does not have a licence in /usr/share/licences.

Looking at the spec file, it seems the licenses are all in the faad2 package - which is not in the default install image.
Can the Licence file be added to the faad2-libs part of the spec file please?

Let me know if there's anything I can help with

Thanks
Mark

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Fedora 43 Workstation edition
2. Confirm faad2-libs is installed by default
3. Confirm faad2-libs is not under /usr/share/licences

Comment 1 Fabio Valentini 2025-12-04 22:04:23 UTC
I can confirm - looks like the LICENSE file should actually be in the -libs subpackage. 
License files MUST get installed if *any* subset of the built packages are installed, and this is currently not the case here.

Not sure why you marked this bug as blocking / depending on a bunch of what look like similar (but unrelated) issues in other packages?

Comment 2 Mark Pearson 2025-12-05 00:20:23 UTC
Sorry - my bad... I created the initial bug and then just cloned it and didn't realise it carried those along (there are about 8 packages in total that have this issue)
I'll go and clean up. Apologies for the extra noise!
Mark

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2025-12-06 08:52:47 UTC
FEDORA-2025-1a9fbdce98 (faad2-2.11.2-5.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-1a9fbdce98

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2025-12-06 08:53:01 UTC
FEDORA-2025-b86ae73f5d (faad2-2.11.2-5.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-b86ae73f5d

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-12-06 09:41:23 UTC
FEDORA-2025-1a9fbdce98 (faad2-2.11.2-5.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2025-12-07 01:10:27 UTC
FEDORA-2025-b86ae73f5d has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-b86ae73f5d`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-b86ae73f5d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-12-09 00:54:00 UTC
FEDORA-2025-b86ae73f5d (faad2-2.11.2-5.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.