We(I) haven't build gkrellm in EPEL10 because the gui is an X11 gui, but I never thought of just building the daemon.
Are you fine with just the daemon and not the gui?

Sure, it's useful to have the daemon, though in the past I always did remote gkrellm with X tunneling.

Yes I am perfectly happy if you can build just the deamon, me myself is not using the gui, only the daemon.

I tried building the whole thing, just to see what would happen.  It looks like XWayland works very will with this.  I'm excited for that.  I'm going to build the whole thing, for both epel10 and 10.1.

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c1b6720c37 (gkrellm-2.4.0-5.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c1b6720c37

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-52cf1c0e98 (gkrellm-2.4.0-5.el10_2) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.2.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-52cf1c0e98

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-52cf1c0e98 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-52cf1c0e98

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c1b6720c37 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c1b6720c37

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Thanks, have installed it, lets se how it behaves

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c1b6720c37 (gkrellm-2.4.0-5.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-52cf1c0e98 (gkrellm-2.4.0-5.el10_2) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.