Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/carlosrodfern/goss-review/-/raw/main/goss.spec SRPM URL: https://gitlab.com/carlosrodfern/goss-review/-/jobs/12582394258/artifacts/raw/goss-0.4.9-1.fc44.src.rpm?inline=false Description: Quick and Easy server testing/validation. Fedora Account System Username: carlosrodfern
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are: - You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description or any of your comments - The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS - The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified in the ticket summary --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/carlosrodfern/goss-review/-/raw/main/goss.spec SRPM URL: https://gitlab.com/carlosrodfern/goss-review/-/jobs/12582394258/artifacts/raw/goss-0.4.9-1.fc44.src.rpm
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9968498 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2426561-goss/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09968498-goss/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - License file license.md is not marked as %license Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Golang Package Review ============== This package was generated using go2rpm and Go Vendor Tools, which simplifies the review. Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated - [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified. - [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers. - [x] The package builds successfully in mock. - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review). - [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors. - [x] The package runs tests in %check. - [x] `%goipath` is set correctly. - [x] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names) - [x] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default) - [x] The package does not use `%gometa -f` if it has dependents that still build for %ix86. - [x] The package complies with the Golang and general Packaging Guidelines. - [-] GO_LDFLAGS are set correctly. Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following: - [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org - [ ] Give go-sig privileges (at least commit) on the package - [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket. - [ ] Consider configuring Packit service to help with maintenance
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/goss
Thank you Mikel!
FEDORA-2026-582b34798a (goss-0.4.9-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-582b34798a
FEDORA-2026-582b34798a (goss-0.4.9-1.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.