Bug 2427951 - Review Request: texlive-collection-binextra - TeX auxiliary programs
Summary: Review Request: texlive-collection-binextra - TeX auxiliary programs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Suchý
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://tug.org/texlive/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-01-08 15:31 UTC by Tom "spot" Callaway
Modified: 2026-02-07 13:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-02-07 13:55:25 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
msuchy: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9987211 to 10001754 (5.75 KB, patch)
2026-01-12 19:01 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Tom "spot" Callaway 2026-01-08 15:31:30 UTC
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-binextra.spec
SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-binextra-svn75830-2.fc44.src.rpm
Description: TeX auxiliary programs Myriad additional TeX-related support programs. Includes programs and macros for DVI file manipulation, literate programming, patgen,
and plenty more.
Fedora Account System Username: spot

This package is a split out version of what used to be all mashed together in the "texlive" package. It is split out by "collection", which is an upstream TeXLive concept.
These packages are difficult to test in isolation, but they are all available in this copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/texlive-2025
All of the components within this package are noarch, they do not need to be built, and they very rarely need to be patched. Accordingly, this package does not unpack all of the component files during %prep (this is the same behavior as current "texlive"), because it would require a large amount of files to be unnecessarily written to disk twice, slowing down the package build process by 2x. The package you're looking at might seem small, but some of these collections are pretty big. I would strongly prefer to have this package continue to work in that way, but if you feel strongly, you can plead your case here. :)

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-08 15:45:40 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9987211
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2427951-texlive-collection-binextra/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09987211-texlive-collection-binextra/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/texlive-collection-binextra/diff.txt
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2026-01-12 18:44:51 UTC
New Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-binextra.spec
New SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-binextra-svn75830-3.fc44.src.rpm

Fixes descriptions, licensing, updates to latest revisions of components.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-12 19:01:31 UTC
Created attachment 2121935 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9987211 to 10001754

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-12 19:01:33 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10001754
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2427951-texlive-collection-binextra/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10001754-texlive-collection-binextra/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Miroslav Suchý 2026-01-15 09:22:11 UTC
> texlive-runtexfile.noarch: E: summary-too-long Automate the process of compiling (La)TeX documents with index, bibliography, ...

Summary should have max 80 characters.

Comment 6 Tom "spot" Callaway 2026-01-15 14:03:30 UTC
New Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-binextra.spec
New SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-binextra-svn75830-4.fc44.src.rpm

Fixes one summary length that was just barely too long.

Comment 7 Miroslav Suchý 2026-01-15 14:34:07 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 8 Miroslav Suchý 2026-01-18 12:34:36 UTC
APPROVED

Comment 9 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-01-22 17:22:57 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/texlive-collection-binextra


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.