Bug 2428633 - Review Request: hcloud - Command-line interface for Hetzner Cloud
Summary: Review Request: hcloud - Command-line interface for Hetzner Cloud
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2428634
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-01-12 09:19 UTC by Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
Modified: 2026-01-12 22:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-01-12 22:32:36 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2026-01-12 09:19:28 UTC
Spec URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/hcloud.spec
SRPM URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/hcloud-1.59.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: A command-line interface for Hetzner Cloud.
Fedora Account System Username: mikelo2

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-12 09:23:54 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10000304
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2428633-hcloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10000304-hcloud/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hcloud
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2026-01-12 14:56:26 UTC
I am not doing a full formal review, but I noticed a few things:

> %autopatch -p1

You do not have any patches. So you do not need it.

> ExcludeArch:    %{ix86} ppc64le s390x

Any reason for this? If there is valid reason you should have comment above linking to BZ. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures
Maybe you wanted to use ExclusiveArch - see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/#_go_language_architectures

Comment 3 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2026-01-12 15:14:53 UTC
>> %autopatch -p1
> You do not have any patches. So you do not need it.

go2rpm template adds that by default. The idea, iirc, was to have it by default but I can remove it.

>> ExcludeArch:    %{ix86} ppc64le s390x

> Any reason for this? If there is valid reason you should have comment above linking to BZ. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures
Maybe you wanted to use ExclusiveArch - see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/#_go_language_architectures

Original package had it so I kept it. "%{ix86}" could be removed as with "%gometa -f" it already ignores that arch.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.