Bug 243260 - setarch dont hanlde alpha arch
setarch dont hanlde alpha arch
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: setarch (Show other bugs)
rawhide
alpha Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jindrich Novy
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-06-08 06:17 EDT by Balint Cristian
Modified: 2013-07-02 19:21 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-06-11 10:34:29 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch to add alpha (334 bytes, patch)
2007-06-08 06:17 EDT, Balint Cristian
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Balint Cristian 2007-06-08 06:17:43 EDT
Description of problem:
setarch dont hanlde alpha arch

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
-devel

How reproducible:
<cbalint> jnovy, setarch alpha /usr/bin/mock -r 
koji/dist-f8-build-6-10 --debug init
<cbalint> setarch: alpha: Unrecognized architecture

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Balint Cristian 2007-06-08 06:17:43 EDT
Created attachment 156561 [details]
patch to add alpha
Comment 2 Jindrich Novy 2007-06-11 07:42:12 EDT
Why do you check twice for __alpha__ definition?

#if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__alpha__)
Comment 3 Balint Cristian 2007-06-11 07:56:21 EDT
yay crazy me :)
Just remove duplicate.
---------------------------------

BTW,
I will gather a list of arch variation (multilib), but i am not sure now.
Indeed plain alpha is enough fro the very now.

In future i settle with the alpha guys what official stuff will 
need like:

alpha
alphaev6
alphaev67
alphaev7

But now i am unsure which is wich, certanly all are pure 64bit but a code from 
ev7 cannot run on ev6 but vice versa yes, so this sounds as multilib stuff.

Comment 4 Jindrich Novy 2007-06-11 10:34:29 EDT
It is now committed upstream, thanks!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.