Bug 2437485 - Review Request: parallel-hashmap - Family of header-only hashmap and btree containers
Summary: Review Request: parallel-hashmap - Family of header-only hashmap and btree co...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Benson Muite
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-02-07 03:03 UTC by Carl George 🤠
Modified: 2026-02-09 06:03 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-02-09 05:48:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
benson_muite: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Carl George 🤠 2026-02-07 03:03:53 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10101505-parallel-hashmap/parallel-hashmap.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10101505-parallel-hashmap/parallel-hashmap-2.0.0-1.fc45.src.rpm

Description:
This repository aims to provide a set of excellent hash map implementations, as
well as a btree alternative to std::map and std::set.

Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge

Comment 1 Benson Muite 2026-02-07 17:33:38 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
     "Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* MIT License", "GNU General
     Public License, Version 3 and/or MIT License", "MIT License". 149
     files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/parallel-hashmap/2437485-parallel-
     hashmap/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
     Note: %define requiring justification: %define autorelease(e:s:pb:n)
     %{?-p:0.}%{lua:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: parallel-hashmap-devel-2.0.0-1.fc44.noarch.rpm
          parallel-hashmap-2.0.0-1.fc44.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpy7xuvs_f')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

parallel-hashmap.src: E: spelling-error ('btree', 'Summary(en_US) btree -> beret, tree, b tree')
parallel-hashmap.src: E: spelling-error ('btree', '%description -l en_US btree -> beret, tree, b tree')
parallel-hashmap-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation
parallel-hashmap-devel.noarch: E: description-line-too-long The parallel-hashmap-devel package contains libraries and header files for developing
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings, 7 filtered, 3 badness; has taken 0.4 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

parallel-hashmap-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation
parallel-hashmap-devel.noarch: E: description-line-too-long The parallel-hashmap-devel package contains libraries and header files for developing
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings, 3 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.1 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/greg7mdp/parallel-hashmap/archive/v2.0.0/parallel-hashmap-2.0.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 4f462f51a3468166ea4cf87c80e001dc1999093264cf55cbda3492ca39a7730b
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4f462f51a3468166ea4cf87c80e001dc1999093264cf55cbda3492ca39a7730b


Requires
--------
parallel-hashmap-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
parallel-hashmap-devel:
    parallel-hashmap-devel
    parallel-hashmap-static



Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2437485
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Generic
Disabled plugins: Java, Haskell, Ocaml, PHP, fonts, SugarActivity, Python, Perl, R
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comments:
a) Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=142045836
b) Please break the first line of the description earlier
c) Please add
%doc README.md
to the list of packaged files. Mays also be helpful
to have examples as documentation.  HTML documentation has
javascript, though maybe it is possible to build docbook which would not
bundle fonts as a pdf does or javascript as the html does.
d) Approved. Please fix (b) before import. Consider (c).

Comment 2 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-02-09 05:17:52 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/parallel-hashmap

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2026-02-09 05:46:05 UTC
FEDORA-2026-580681822d (parallel-hashmap-2.0.0-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-580681822d

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2026-02-09 05:48:44 UTC
FEDORA-2026-580681822d (parallel-hashmap-2.0.0-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2026-02-09 06:00:02 UTC
FEDORA-2026-97f17c8fe0 (parallel-hashmap-2.0.0-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-97f17c8fe0

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2026-02-09 06:03:44 UTC
FEDORA-2026-97f17c8fe0 (parallel-hashmap-2.0.0-1.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.