Any chance you can request that lablgl gets renamed to ocaml-lablgl (per the
upcoming ocaml guidelines)?
Also, as you've already said you don't have any intentions to package for EPEL
at present, would you mind if I requested EL- branches for lablgl? (it's
another package I need for ocaml-SDL etc)
*** Bug 241697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I did the changes to the spec file, and a few others as well. My latest version
of spec/srpm is here:
Yes, this should be done. How do I do it?
Package Change Request
Package Name: lablgl
Rename package to ocaml-lablgl as of
Did you want to preserve the cvs history of the package?
Or did you just want the new package name created?
(In reply to comment #6)
> Did you want to preserve the cvs history of the package?
Yes, I think this would be useful.
(In reply to comment #0)
> Also, as you've already said you don't have any intentions to package for EPEL
> at present, would you mind if I requested EL- branches for lablgl? (it's
> another package I need for ocaml-SDL etc)
Can you also consider this part of the request as well?
Renamed and branched for EL-5. Please verify that the rename happened as
expected. You may need to upload source tarballs again.
I renamed lablgl.spec to ocaml-labgl.spec and upload the tar.
I also made the necessary changes to the .spec file.
However koji reports the following error:
BuildError: package ocaml-lablgl not in list for tag dist-f8
Is there something still to do?
The owners.list wasn't synced up with koji.
It should be now... can you try your build again?
The package is now build for rawhide.
Nigel and Richard, please take a look at the package,
then I go on to ocaml-lablgtk.
Please see my updated spec file which contains fixes above
what is in Rawhide:
Hey Gemi, when the cvs was done, Warren branched for EL-5 with you as the branch
owner, was this your intention to happen? Personally I would quite like/need
ocaml-lablgl/ocaml-lablgtk for EL-4 as well, can you fill in another change
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported
during the development of Fedora 8. In order to refocus our efforts as
a project we are changing the version of this bug to '8'.
If this bug still exists in rawhide, please change the version back to
(If you're unable to change the bug's version, add a comment to the bug
and someone will change it for you.)
Thanks for your help and we apologize for the interruption.
The process we're following is outlined here:
We will be following the process here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this
doesn't happen again.