Bug 2438770 - Review Request: rust-dtor - __attribute__((destructor)) for Rust
Summary: Review Request: rust-dtor - __attribute__((destructor)) for Rust
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ben Beasley
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://crates.io/crates/dtor
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2438774
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-02-10 23:00 UTC by Fabio Valentini
Modified: 2026-02-13 11:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rust-dtor-0.0.6-1.fc45
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-02-13 11:46:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
code: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fabio Valentini 2026-02-10 23:00:27 UTC
Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-dtor.spec
SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-dtor-0.0.6-1.fc43.src.rpm
Upstream URL: https://crates.io/crates/dtor

Description:
__attribute__((destructor)) for Rust.

Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe

Comment 1 Fabio Valentini 2026-02-10 23:10:57 UTC
This is intentionally not the latest version:

ctor v0.4.3 (required by bear, not the latest version) requires dtor v0.0.6 (not the latest version).

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2026-02-10 23:12:15 UTC
Note: LICENSE-* files are included in published crates starting in the version *after* the one targeted here.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2026-02-11 04:12:57 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10115236
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2438770-rust-dtor/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10115236-rust-dtor/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Ben Beasley 2026-02-13 10:12:24 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

The spec file is generated by rust2rpm, simplifying the review. The only
changes are to handle missing license files in the published crate, which is
correctly implemented, and to disable tests, which is adequately justified (a
dependency is not packaged, and there are no tests in the published crate
anyway).


Issues:
=======
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
  Note: warning: File listed twice:
  /usr/share/cargo/registry/dtor-0.0.6/LICENSE-APACHE
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_duplicate_files

  OK: not a serious problem, due to reasonable rust2rpm design decisions


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in /home/ben/fedora/review/2438770-rust-
     dtor/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

     Missing license files are already fixed upstream in a later release.

[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
     dtor-devel , rust-dtor+default-devel , rust-
     dtor+__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe-devel , rust-dtor+proc_macro-devel ,
     rust-dtor+used_linker-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.

     No tests are included.

[!]: Latest version is packaged.

     An older version is packaged to satisfy the dependencies of bear, which is
     a reasonable justification.

[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.

     Upstream’s own license texts from GitHub are correctly and necessarily
     added.

[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.

     https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=142249165

[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.

     Tests are disabled due to an unpackaged dependency, but there are no
     usable tests in the crate anyway. This is unfortunate, but the
     justification is adequate.

[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: rust-dtor-devel-0.0.6-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-dtor+default-devel-0.0.6-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-dtor+__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe-devel-0.0.6-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-dtor+proc_macro-devel-0.0.6-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-dtor+used_linker-devel-0.0.6-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-dtor-0.0.6-1.fc45.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpw765q570')]
checks: 32, packages: 6

rust-dtor+__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+default-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+default-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+proc_macro-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+proc_macro-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+used_linker-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+used_linker-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor.src: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor.src: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 0 warnings, 31 filtered, 12 badness; has taken 0.4 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 5

rust-dtor+default-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+default-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+proc_macro-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+proc_macro-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+used_linker-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', 'Summary(en_US) destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
rust-dtor+used_linker-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('destructor', '%description -l en_US destructor -> destruct or, destruct-or, destruction')
 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 0 warnings, 27 filtered, 10 badness; has taken 0.1 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/dtor/0.0.6/download#/dtor-0.0.6.crate :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 97cbdf2ad6846025e8e25df05171abfb30e3ababa12ee0a0e44b9bbe570633a8
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 97cbdf2ad6846025e8e25df05171abfb30e3ababa12ee0a0e44b9bbe570633a8
https://github.com/mmastrac/rust-ctor/raw/117b4d1/LICENSE-APACHE :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : a8ad31b1c3f40dca5a84119351b8fa8ddc868edd77fad8a8ebf6d8f2d16fa4ae
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a8ad31b1c3f40dca5a84119351b8fa8ddc868edd77fad8a8ebf6d8f2d16fa4ae
https://github.com/mmastrac/rust-ctor/raw/117b4d1/LICENSE-MIT :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : bccaa8b6c09f94e81f06696e179dbe058464bbdfbc823b6d49cada1d71e84ac3
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : bccaa8b6c09f94e81f06696e179dbe058464bbdfbc823b6d49cada1d71e84ac3


Requires
--------
rust-dtor-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo

rust-dtor+default-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(dtor)
    crate(dtor/__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe)
    crate(dtor/proc_macro)

rust-dtor+__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(dtor)

rust-dtor+proc_macro-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(dtor)
    crate(dtor-proc-macro/default)

rust-dtor+used_linker-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(dtor)



Provides
--------
rust-dtor-devel:
    crate(dtor)
    rust-dtor-devel

rust-dtor+default-devel:
    crate(dtor/default)
    rust-dtor+default-devel

rust-dtor+__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe-devel:
    crate(dtor/__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe)
    rust-dtor+__no_warn_on_missing_unsafe-devel

rust-dtor+proc_macro-devel:
    crate(dtor/proc_macro)
    rust-dtor+proc_macro-devel

rust-dtor+used_linker-devel:
    crate(dtor/used_linker)
    rust-dtor+used_linker-devel



Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2438770 --mock-options=--enablerepo=local
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-aarch64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: R, Python, Haskell, Java, SugarActivity, Perl, fonts, PHP, Ocaml, C/C++
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 5 Fabio Valentini 2026-02-13 10:59:51 UTC
Thank you for the review!

Comment 6 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-02-13 11:01:33 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-dtor

Comment 7 Fabio Valentini 2026-02-13 11:46:34 UTC
Imported and built:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-d9073ec8d5


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.