Bug 2440362 - Review Request: python-unittest-xml-reporting - unittest-based test runner with Ant/JUnit like XML reporting
Summary: Review Request: python-unittest-xml-reporting - unittest-based test runner wi...
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Phil Wyett
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2440336
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-02-17 13:32 UTC by Benson Muite
Modified: 2026-03-17 16:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
philip.wyett: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Benson Muite 2026-02-17 13:32:53 UTC
spec: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/python-unittest-xml-reporting.spec
srpm: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/python-unittest-xml-reporting-4.0.0-1.fc43.src.rpm

description:
A unittest test runner that can save test results to XML files in xUnit format.
The files can be consumed by a wide range of tools, such as build systems, IDEs
and continuous integration servers.

fas: fed500

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Phil Wyett 2026-03-10 01:17:19 UTC
Hi,

I thought I would take this package as it is a dep I need.

* Builds - Local: Good

* Builds - COPR: Good

* RPM Lint: Issue

python-unittest-xml-reporting.src: W: summary-not-capitalized unittest-based test runner with Ant/JUnit like XML reporting.
python3-unittest-xml-reporting.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized unittest-based test runner with Ant/JUnit like XML reporting.
python-unittest-xml-reporting.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot unittest-based test runner with Ant/JUnit like XML reporting.
python3-unittest-xml-reporting.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot unittest-based test runner with Ant/JUnit like XML reporting.

* Installs: Good

* Works with other source: Good

Summary
=======

A couple of lint issues above to be corrected.

Regards

Phil

Comment 3 Phil Wyett 2026-03-17 16:58:37 UTC
Hi,

Many thanks for making the change highlighted.

Marking as '+'.

You can now request the package and then import the latest srpm.

Regards

Phil


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.